Daily step counts of 4,000 or more tied to reduced risk of heart disease, mortality in older women: Study

Written By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2025-10-26 15:15 GMT   |   Update On 2025-10-26 15:15 GMT
Advertisement

Tracking daily steps has become a staple exercise metric as smart devices keep count with ease. This physical activity stimulates bodily repair and maintenance, which is especially important as we age. But how many steps do you need to reap health benefits? A new study by investigators from Mass General Brigham examined 13,547 older women, comparing their step counts over a one week period against their mortality and cardiovascular disease rates over the next decade. They found that achieving just 4,000 steps one or two days per week was associated with lower risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease-and with more steps came even greater benefits, up to a point when risk reductions leveled. Their results are published in The British Journal of Sports Medicine.

Advertisement

“In countries like the United States, advances in technology have made it such that we don’t really move very much, and older individuals are among those least active,” said senior author I-Min Lee, MBBS, ScD, an epidemiologist in the Mass General Brigham Department of Medicine and the Division of Preventive Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH). “Because of today’s low step counts, it’s increasingly important to determine the minimum amount of physical activity required to improve health outcomes, so that we can offer realistic and feasible goals for the public.”

In this federally funded study, Mass General Brigham researchers conducted a prospective cohort study of 13,574 older women (71.8 years old on average) without cardiovascular disease or cancer from BWH’s Women’s Health Study. The women wore ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers to track their steps over seven days between 2011 and 2015. For the next 10 years, the researchers monitored mortality and cardiovascular disease incidence.

Participants were sorted by how many days per week they achieved step thresholds at or above 4,000, 5,000, 6,000, or 7,000. Those that got 4,000 steps one or two days per week had 26% lower mortality risk and 27% lower cardiovascular disease risk compared to those that never hit 4,000 on any day. What’s more, reaching 4,000 steps three or more days in a week decreased mortality risk further to 40%. As for women that reached the higher step thresholds, cardiovascular disease risk leveled out.

Interestingly, the health benefits seem to be associated with the total volume of steps taken, rather than how many days per week a particular threshold was achieved. This suggests that there isn’t a “better” way to get steps—women with similar total volume of steps, either achieved by consistent steps throughout the week or sporadic steps in just a few days, had similar health benefits.

Future research will need to explore whether these effects hold in populations beyond older, American, mostly white women. Additionally, the researchers are curious to analyze even lower step count thresholds to determine whether less than 4,000 steps can produce similar health benefits.

“I hope our findings encourage the addition of step count metrics to physical activity guidelines, including the upcoming 2028 U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines,” said lead and corresponding author Rikuta Hamaya, MD, of Mass General Brigham’s Department of Medicine and the Division of Preventive Medicine at BWH. “If we can promote taking at least 4,000 steps once per week in older women, we could reduce mortality and cardiovascular disease risk across the country.”

Reference:

Hamaya R, Evenson KR, Lieberman D, et alAssociation between frequency of meeting daily step thresholds and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease in older womenBritish Journal of Sports Medicine Published Online First: 21 October 2025. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2025-110311

Tags:    
Article Source : British Journal of Sports Medicine

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News