Early improvement in Ejection fraction post TAVR improves survival in AS patients: JAMA study

Written By :  dr. Abhimanyu Uppal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-07-29 18:47 GMT   |   Update On 2022-07-29 18:47 GMT
Advertisement

In patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 50%, early LVEF improvement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with improved 1-year mortality; however, its association with long-term clinical outcomes is not known. A recent study by Kolte et al has shown that every 1 in 3 patients experience LVEF improvement within 1 month after TAVR and this early LVEF improvement is translated to lower 5-year all-cause and cardiac death in female subjects.

Advertisement

Prior studies have shown that in patients with severe AS and LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction [LVEF], <40%-50%), approximately half experience an improvement in LVEF (defined as an increase of ≥10% points) within 30 days after TAVR.

The present study was designed to sought the impact of this early improvement in LV dynamics on long term survival of patients.

This cohort study analyzed patients enrolled in PARTNER 1, 2, and S3 trials and registries. High- and intermediate-risk patients with baseline LVEF less than 50% who underwent transfemoral TAVR were included in the current study. Early LVEF improvement was defined as increase of 10 percentage points or more at 30 days. The main outcome was all-cause death at 5 years.

The study gave following results:

1. Early LVEF improvement was seen in a third of patients.

2. Prior myocardial infarction, diabetes, cancer, higher baseline LVEF, larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and larger aortic valve area were independently associated with lower likelihood of LVEF improvement.

3. Patients with vs without early LVEF improvement after TAVR had lower 5-year all-cause death and cardiac death.

4. In multivariable analyses, early improvement in was associated with lower 5-year all-cause death and cardiac death after TAVR.

5. There were no statistically significant differences in rehospitalization, New York Heart Association functional class, or Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary score at 5 years in patients with vs without early LVEF improvement.

6. In subgroup analysis, the association between early LVEF improvement and 5-year all-cause death was consistent regardless of the presence or absence of coronary artery disease or prior myocardial infarction.

7. There was significant interaction by sex such that early LVEF improvement was associated with improved 5-year outcomes in female individuals but not in male individuals

Why there is a gender difference?

"Because LVEF underestimates the degree of LV systolic dysfunction in presence of concentric hypertrophy, which is more prevalent and more pronounced in female vs male individuals, it is possible that post-TAVR, the regression of the concentric hypertrophy may, at least in part, mask the magnitude of improvement in LV systolic function and LVEF such that an improvement of 10% points in LVEF in female individuals may actually represent a more important true improvement in LV systolic function than the same improvement of 10% points in male individuals", note authors in the discussion section.

Further studies are needed to understand the pathophysiologic mechanism(s) mediating reduced mortality in patients with early LVEF recovery after TAVR.

Source: JAMA Cardiology: JAMA Cardiol. Published online July 27, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2222

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News