Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel not affected by eGFR in ACS patients: ISAR-REACT 5 trial

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-01-12 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-18 10:48 GMT
Advertisement
Click the Play button to listen to article

Germany: Results from ISAR-REACT 5 trial have shown that a reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is related to increased risk for ischemic and bleeding events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, the reduction had no significant impact on the relative safety and efficacy of ticagrelor versus prasugrel. The study was published in the journal JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

Advertisement

Prior to this study, there was no clarity on the outcomes of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with ACS according to eGFR. Jochen Wöhrle, Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Medical Campus Lake Constance, Friedrichshafen, Germany, and colleagues therefore aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor versus prasugrel for patients with ACS according to their eGFRs. 

The study included 4,012 patients who were then categorized into three groups: low eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2), intermediate eGFR (≥60 and <90 mL/min/1.73 m2), and high eGFR (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke; the secondary safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 to 5 bleeding, both at 1 year. 

The research revealed the following findings:

  • Patients with low eGFRs had a higher risk for the primary endpoint compared with patients with intermediate eGFRs (adjusted HR: 1.89) and those with high eGFRs (adjusted HR: 2.33).
  • A risk excess for low eGFR was also observed for bleeding (adjusted HR: 1.55 vs intermediate eGFR; adjusted HR: 1.59 vs high eGFR).
  • However, eGFR did not affect the relative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel.
  • In patients with low eGFR, the primary endpoint occurred in 20.5% with ticagrelor and in 14.7% with prasugrel (HR: 1.47); there was no significant difference in bleeding.

The researchers concluded, these results show that among patients with ACS, reduction of eGFR is associated with increased risk for ischemic and bleeding events but has no significant impact on the relative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel. 

Reference:

The study titled, "Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in Relation to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate," is published in the journal JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

DOI: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S193687982101219X

Tags:    
Article Source : JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News