Lidocaine better than amidorone in improving survival in patients of in-hospital cardiac arrest

Written By :  Jacinthlyn Sylvia
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-11-17 05:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-19 06:43 GMT

A new study published in the Chest Journal shows that in patients undergoing in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) brought on by ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT), lidocaine may produce better results than amiodarone.Based on studies of cardiac arrests that occurred outside of hospitals, the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines of the American Heart...

Login or Register to read the full article

A new study published in the Chest Journal shows that in patients undergoing in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) brought on by ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT), lidocaine may produce better results than amiodarone.

Based on studies of cardiac arrests that occurred outside of hospitals, the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines of the American Heart Association (AHA) recommend the use of either amiodarone or lidocaine for cardiac arrest caused by VT/VF. There aren't many studies comparing amiodarone and lidocaine in adult populations experiencing VT/VF arrest in-hospital. In order to determine if treatment with amiodarone vs. lidocaine therapy had distinct relationships with outcomes among adult patients who experience in-hospital cardiac arrest from VT/VF, Deborah Wagner and colleagues undertook this study.

Adult patients who experienced VT/VF in-hospital cardiac arrest that was resistant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014, within the American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation® (GWTG-R) participating hospitals, were the subject of a retrospective cohort study. The main result was the resumption of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Positive neurological outcomes, 24-hour survival, and survival to hospital release were secondary outcomes.

The key findings of this study were:

1. 68.7% (n=10,058) of the 14,630 patients with in-hospital VT/VF arrest received amiodarone, whereas 31.2% (n=4,572) received lidocaine.

2. When all covariates were statistically controlled, lidocaine was associated with statistically significantly higher odds of:

    a) ROSC, adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.15, p=0.01, average marginal effect (AME)=2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI)=.5, 4.2);

    b) 24-hour survival, AOR=1.16, p=.004, AME=3.0, 95% CI=0.9, 5.1;

    c) survival to discharge, AOR=1.19, Results from multivariable logistic regression analysis and propensity score techniques were comparable.

In conclusion, adult patients with IHCA from VT/VF who received lidocaine treatment had statistically substantially higher rates of ROSC, 24-hour surviving, survival to hospital discharge, and good neurological outcomes compared to those who received amiodarone.

Reference:

Wagner, D., Kronick, S. L., Nawer, H., Cranford, J. A., Bradley, S. M., & Neumar, R. W. (2022). Comparative Effectiveness of Amiodarone and Lidocaine for Treatment of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (IHCA). In Chest. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.10.024

Tags:    
Article Source : Chest Journal

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News