3D printing with press technique improves fatigue survival of LD crowns
Lithium disilicate monolithic crowns have similar fatigue behaviour in CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed techniques according to a recent study published in the Journal of Dentistry.
This study aimed to evaluate the adaptation and fatigue behaviour of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) monolithic crowns produced by the press (combined with 3D-printing) and CAD/CAM milling (control) techniques.
Thirty abutment preparations with a chamfer finish line were produced with a dentin analogue material and scanned with an extraoral scanner. Captured images were processed using CAD software to design a premolar. Blocks of LD were milled using a CAD/CAM system. For the press technique, crowns were first 3D-printed using polymeric material and the heat-pressing protocol was performed. Crowns were adhesively cemented to the abutments and scanned using micro-CT. Files were processed and cross-sectional images were analysed in five measuring points marginal, axial angle, axial, occlusal angle and occlusal. Fatigue test was performed in an MTS universal testing machine (2 Hz, 37°C distilled water) using an anatomic composite piston, following the step-stress method. Failures were detected with an acoustic system and confirmed by transillumination. A cumulative damage-Weibull distribution (95% CI) was used to analyze the fatigue data. Gap thickness data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (α=0.05).
Results:
- CAD/CAM milling resulted in larger gap thickness in the occlusal area and smaller gap thickness in the axial angle and axial area than press (p<0.05).
- The probability of failure was similar for crowns produced with CAD/CAM milling and press. The most frequent failure mode was radial crack.
LD crowns produced using the combination of 3D-printing/press technique showed similar fatigue behaviour to CAD/CAM milled control group and resulted in smaller gap thickness at the occlusal region. A more controlled process can be achieved by replacing conventional restoration waxing with 3D printing, which in combination with the press technique produces lithium disilicate glass-ceramic monolithic crowns with good adaptation and high fatigue survival.
Reference:
CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: adaptation and fatigue behaviour by Rodrigo Ottoni et al. published in the Journal of Dentistry.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104181
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.