This study aimed to evaluate the adaptation and fatigue  behaviour of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) monolithic crowns produced by the press (combined with 3D-printing) and CAD/CAM milling (control) techniques.
    Thirty abutment preparations with a chamfer finish line were  produced with a dentin analogue material and scanned with an extraoral scanner.  Captured images were processed using CAD software to design a premolar. Blocks  of LD were milled using a CAD/CAM system. For the press technique, crowns were  first 3D-printed using polymeric material and the heat-pressing protocol was  performed. Crowns were adhesively cemented to the abutments and scanned using  micro-CT. Files were processed and cross-sectional images were analysed in five  measuring points marginal, axial angle, axial, occlusal angle and occlusal.  Fatigue test was performed in an MTS universal testing machine (2 Hz, 37°C  distilled water) using an anatomic composite piston, following the step-stress  method. Failures were detected with an acoustic system and confirmed by  transillumination. A cumulative damage-Weibull distribution (95% CI) was used  to analyze the fatigue data. Gap thickness data were analyzed using  Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (α=0.05).
    Results:
    - CAD/CAM milling resulted in larger gap thickness  in the occlusal area and smaller gap thickness in the axial angle and axial  area than press (p<0.05). 
- The probability of failure was similar for  crowns produced with CAD/CAM milling and press. The most frequent failure mode  was radial crack.
LD crowns produced using the combination of  3D-printing/press technique showed similar fatigue behaviour to CAD/CAM milled  control group and resulted in smaller gap thickness at the occlusal region. A  more controlled process can be achieved by replacing conventional restoration  waxing with 3D printing, which in combination with the press technique produces  lithium disilicate glass-ceramic monolithic crowns with good adaptation and  high fatigue survival.
    Reference:
    CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate  monolithic crowns: adaptation and fatigue behaviour by Rodrigo Ottoni et al.  published in the Journal of Dentistry.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104181
    
 
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.