Biphasic calcium phosphate tied to higher graft volume stability in lateral window sinus floor elevation

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-01-13 00:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-01-13 00:31 GMT
Advertisement

Biphasic calcium phosphate tied to higher graft volume stability in lateral window sinus floor elevation suggests a new study published in the Clinical Oral Implants Research.

A study was done to assess in a prospective randomised trial two psychogenic bone substitutes—biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) versus almost pure hydroxyapatite (HA)—for their volume stability and clinical implications after sinus floor elevation (SFE). Twenty patients requiring lateral-window sinus floor elevation 6 months before implant surgery were randomized to a biphasic calcium phosphate or hydroxyapatite group. As the primary outcome, the grafts were analyzed for volume stability, using four cone-beam computed tomography scans obtained immediately/6/12/24 months after sinus floor elevation. Secondary outcomes were implant survival, success, periotest values, oral-health-related quality of life (OHIP-G14), and pain (VAS).Results: Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit test revealed normal distribution of samples (p = .200). At 6/12/24 months, the augmented volumes decreased to 96/92/90% (HA) or 99/96/96% (biphasic calcium phosphate). Volume changes were significantly a factor of time and reached significantly lower values in the hydroxyapatite group. The significant intergroup difference in volume losses was notable at 24 months (p = .021; t-test for independent samples). Periotest values decreased from −3/−4.1 (HA/BCP) after implant placement to −6.3/−4.5 (HA/BCP) after 6 months. OHIP scores diverged at 2 months and largely resolved by 24 months. VAS scores were comparable, 2.2 at 1 week after sinus floor elevation being their highest mean level. After 2 years, both groups experienced no biological or technical complications, demonstrating a consistent healing trajectory without notable symptoms. Although no significant differences were observed in implant stability and survival, biphasic calcium phosphate demonstrated higher volume stability than hydroxyapatite.

Advertisement

Reference: Sokolowski, A., Theisen, K., Arefnia, B., Payer, M., Lorenzoni, M., & Sokolowski, A. (2023). A randomized clinical trial of phycogenic materials for sinus grafting with hydroxyapatite versus biphasic calcium phosphate: 2 years clinical outcomes. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 00, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14209

Keywords: Biphasic calcium phosphate, graft volume, stability, lateral window, sinus floor elevation, Sokolowski, A., Theisen, K., Arefnia, B., Payer, M., Lorenzoni, M., & Sokolowski, A, Clinical Oral Implants Research




Tags:    
Article Source : Clinical Oral Implants Research

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News