Cone beam computed tomography better for tintraoral radiography for evaluating Peri implant bone defect

Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-06-14 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-06-14 14:31 GMT

The importance of radiology in assessing the bone around the implants is undeniable. In this sense, postoperative radiographic evaluation of dental implants and the advantages and disadvantages of different radiographic modalities are importantCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is better for tintraoral radiography for evaluating Peri implant bone defect suggests a new study published in...

Login or Register to read the full article

The importance of radiology in assessing the bone around the implants is undeniable. In this sense, postoperative radiographic evaluation of dental implants and the advantages and disadvantages of different radiographic modalities are important

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is better for tintraoral radiography for evaluating Peri implant bone defect suggests a new study published in the Oral Radiology

The objective of this work was to perform an integrative review of the inspection of peri-implant bone defects using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). An electronic search was performed in the PubMed database using the following scientific terms: CBCT or Cone Beam computed tomography; dental implant; peri-implant; bone loss; defects. The survey identified 267 studies, of which 18 were considered relevant to this study. These studies provided important data taking into account the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in the detection and measurement of peri-implant bone defects such as fenestrations, dehiscence and intraosseous circumferential defects. The effectiveness of CBCT in aiding in geometric bone calculations and in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects was influenced by factors such as artefacts, defect size, bone wall thickness, implant material, adjustment of acquisition parameters and observer experience. A not insignificant number of studies compared intraoral radiography to CBCT in the detection of peri-implant bone loss. CBCT was clearly superior to intraoral radiography in the detection of all peri-implant bone defects, except for defects located in the interproximal zone. In general, studies have shown that peri-implant bone measurements adjacent to the implant surface can be correctly determined, as well as the diagnosis of peri-implant bone defects with an average discrepancy of less than 1 mm from the actual measurement of the defect.

Reference:

Costa, J.A., Mendes, J.M., Salazar, F. et al. Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review. Oral Radiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00683-w


Keywords:

Costa, J.A., Mendes, J.M., Salazar, F, Oral Radiology, Analysis, peri-implant, bone, defects, using, cone, beam, computed, tomography, (CBCT), integrative review


Tags:    
Article Source : Oral radiology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News