Guided zygomatic implant placement superior to free-hand zygomatic implant placement

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-03-16 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-03-16 03:30 GMT

Guided zygomatic implant placement was superior than free-hand zygomatic implant placement, according to a recent study published in the Journal of Dentistry. Dental implant surgery is a procedure that replaces tooth roots with metal, screwlike posts and replaces damaged or missing teeth with artificial teeth that look and function much like real ones The aim of this human cadaver...

Login or Register to read the full article

Guided zygomatic implant placement was superior than free-hand zygomatic implant placement, according to a recent study published in the Journal of Dentistry.

Dental implant surgery is a procedure that replaces tooth roots with metal, screwlike posts and replaces damaged or missing teeth with artificial teeth that look and function much like real ones

The aim of this human cadaver study was to compare the accuracy of guided versus free-hand zygomatic implant placement. For the guided implant placement laser sintered titanium templates were used.

Forty zygomatic implants were placed in ten cadavers heads. For each case two implants were inserted using the guided protocol (Ezgoma guide, Noris Medical, Israel) and the related surgical kit and the other two by using a free hand approach. Post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans were carried out to assess the deviations between planned and inserted implants. The accuracy was measured by overlaying the post-operative CT scan (with the final position of the achieved implants) with the pre-operative CT scan (with the planned implants).

The Results of the study are:

The difference of the mean between planned and placed zygomatic implants by using surgical guides or free hand were statistically significant for all the variables evaluated: angular deviation (1.19°±0.40° and 4.92°±1.71°, p<0.001), linear distance deviation at coronal point (0.88 mm±0.33 mm and 2.04 mm±0.56 mm, p<0.001), at apical point (0.79 mm±0.23 mm and 3.23 mm±1.43 mm, p<0.001) and at apical depth (0.35 mm±0.25 mm and 1.02 mm±0.61 mm, p<0.001).

Thus, the researchers concluded that the proposed guided surgery system exhibited a higher accuracy for all the investigated variables, when compared to the free hand technique.

Reference:

A study named, A novel guided zygomatic implant surgery system compared to free hand: A human cadaver study on accuracy by E.Grecch et al. published in the Journal of Dentistry.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030057122100364X


Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Dentistry

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News