Intranasal mucosal atomization for Sedation for Pediatric Dental Anxiety: Parent and Child Perspectives

Recently published research paper focuses on investigating the opinions, beliefs, and existing knowledge of parents and children regarding intranasal sedation for dental anxiety in children, specifically focusing on the method of drug delivery through a mucosal atomization device (MAD). The study aimed to examine the perceptions of parents and children regarding intranasal sedation and the method of drug delivery through MAD.

The study involved 50 parents (aged 20 to 50) with children aged five to nine years. After watching a video about intranasal sedation technique with MAD, the parents and children completed a questionnaire. The statistical analysis revealed a significant correlation between parental socioeconomic status and acceptance of intranasal sedation. Parents with higher education levels exhibited a greater level of acceptance, and parents whose children had prior dental experiences were more likely to view intranasal sedation as a safe option. Moreover, a notable improvement in children's behavior before and after intranasal sedation indicated the effectiveness of this method.

Positive Perception of Intranasal Sedation

The intranasal route for sedation administration was highlighted for its rapid onset of action and relatively straightforward administration approach. The study found a positive perception of safety and trust among parents regarding intranasal sedation through MAD for pediatric dental procedures. The research indicated the potential of intranasal sedation facilitated by MAD as a well-received and reliable approach in pediatric dental care.

The paper emphasized that identifying acceptable treatment techniques among parents and understanding the factors influencing their approval or disapproval of specific methods is crucial. The study highlighted a positive inclination and trust from parents towards intranasal sedation facilitated by MAD, underscoring its potential as a well-received and reliable approach in pediatric dental care.

While the study provided valuable insights into the acceptability and efficacy of intranasal sedation in dental settings, it acknowledged limitations such as the limited sample size, absence of post-treatment assessment, and the need for future research with larger sample sizes to further explore the acceptability and efficacy of intranasal sedation in dental settings.

Key Points

- The research indicates a positive perception of safety and trust among parents regarding intranasal sedation through MAD for pediatric dental procedures. There is a notable improvement in children's behavior before and after intranasal sedation, indicating the effectiveness of this method.

- The study highlights a positive inclination and trust from parents towards intranasal sedation facilitated by MAD, underscoring its potential as a well-received and reliable approach in pediatric dental care. However, the study acknowledges limitations such as the limited sample size and the need for future research with larger sample sizes to further explore the acceptability and efficacy of intranasal sedation in dental settings.

Reference -

M N, Anthonet Sruthi M (April 23, 2024) A Comparative Study of Parent and Child Perspectives on Using the Intranasal Mucosal Atomization Device for Behavior Management in Pediatric Dental Sedation. Cureus 16(4): e58832. DOI 10.7759/cureus.58832