Nonguided implant placement approach okay for placement of One-piece mini-implants to support mandibular overdenture: Study

Published On 2024-11-28 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-11-28 14:30 GMT
Advertisement

Nonguided implant placement approach okay for placement of One-piece mini-implants to support mandibular overdenture suggests a study published in the Clinical Oral Implants Research.

A study was done to assess the relative position of mini-implants to retain a mandibular overdenture, according to the surgical protocol, technical and anatomical factors.Mandibular cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were analyzed for 73 patients who received four one-piece titanium-zirconium mini-implants. Drilling was performed using a 1.6 mm needle drill and a 2.2 mm Pilot Drill, according to the bone density with a surgical stent. Post-insertion CBCT images in DICOM format were analyzed using the E-Vol-DX software with BAR filters. Divergence angle between implants and between implants and the overdenture path of insertion was measured using CliniView 10.2.6 software. Results: Divergence between implants ranged from 0° to 22.3° (mean = 4.2; SD = 3.7) in the lateral and from 0° to 26.2° (mean = 5.3; SD = 4.1) in the frontal projections (p < .001). Only 1 (0.2%) and 3 (0.7%) of the measurements were higher than 20° in the lateral and frontal views, respectively. The mean angulations between the implant and the path of insertion for the overdenture were 9.3° (SD = 7.5) and 4.0° (SD = 2.9) for the lateral and frontal views, respectively (p < .001). Regression analyses showed a significant association between the divergence of implants and the frontal view projection (p < .001), greater distance between the paired implants (p = .017), the flapped surgical protocol (p = .002), higher final insertion torque (p = .011), and deeper preparation with the needle drill (p < .001). The mini-implants were placed with low divergence angles and satisfactory parallelism. Factors including shorter distances between the implants, higher density bone, and a flapless surgical approach all contributed positively to improved parallelism of the mini-implants.

Advertisement

Reference:

Leles, C. R., de Oliveira Moura-Neto, L., Silva, J. R., Nascimento, L. N., Curado, T. F. F., Costa, N. L., Schimmel, M., & McKenna, G. (2024). A cross-sectional CBCT assessment of the relative position of one-piece titanium-zirconium mini-implants placed for mandibular overdentures using non-guided surgery. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 00, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14335

Keywords:

Nonguided, implant, placement, approach, okay, placement, One-piece, mini-implants, support, mandibular, overdenture, study, Clinical Oral Implants Research, Leles, C. R., de Oliveira Moura-Neto, L., Silva, J. R., Nascimento, L. N., Curado, T. F. F., Costa, N. L., Schimmel, M., & McKenna, G.




Tags:    
Article Source : Clinical Oral Implants Research

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News