Glucagon test useful alternative to insulin tolerance test in Diagnosing GH Deficiency in Transition Age, finds research
Italy: A recent study published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism has shed light on the accuracy of glucagon testing across transition in young adults with childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency (GHD).
The study showed that a GH peak to glucagon test (GST) <5.8 μg/L is an accurate diagnostic cutoff for young adults with childhood-onset GHD and a high pretest probability of permanent GHD.
Our data confirm GST to be a safe alternative to insulin tolerance test (ITT) for evaluating GH secretion in young adults with childhood-onset GHD following attainment of adult height and that patients who demonstrated peak GH < 5.8 μg/L can restart rhGH therapy, the researchers wrote.
The insulin tolerance test is the “gold standard” for GHD confirmation following the attainment of adult stature, and a GH threshold of 6 μg/L or less is recommended to determine whether GHD continues at the time of transition to adult care. However, ITT is not suited for patients with epilepsy, seizures, or cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. While the GST could be an alternative form of GH stimulation for determining the need for ongoing GH therapy into adulthood, there is no confirmation of diagnostic cutoffs for this test in clinical practice.
The 2019 American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists guidelines indicate peak GH cutoffs to GST of ≤3, and ≤1 µg/L in permanent GHD diagnosis during the transition phase. Considering this, Daniela Fava, Pediatric Endocrinology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy, and colleagues aimed to evaluate the accuracy of GST compared to insulin tolerance test in the definition of GHD at adult height achievement.
The study included ninety-seven subjects with childhood-onset GHD (median age, 17.39 years). They underwent ITT, GST, and IGF-1 testing; 44 subjects were idiopathic (isolated GHD), 35 moderate organic GHD (0-2 hormone deficiencies), and 18 severe organic GHD (≥3 hormone deficiencies).
The study led to the following findings:
- Bland and Altman's analysis showed a high consistency of GH peak measures after ITT and GST.
- Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified 7.3 μg/L as the optimal GH peak cutoff to GST [sensitivity 95.7%, specificity 88.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) 88.0%, negative predictive value (NPV) 95.7%] able to correctly classify 91.8% of the entire cohort while 5.8 μg/L was the best GH peak cutoff able to correctly classify 91.4% of moderate organic GHD patients (sensitivity 96.0%, specificity 80.0%, PPV 92.3%, NPV 88.9%).
- Patients with ≥3 hormone deficiencies showed a GH peak <5 μg/L at ITT and <5.8 μg/L at GST but 1.
- The optimal cutoff for IGF-1 was a −1.4 SD score (sensitivity 75%, specificity 94%, PPV 91.7%, NPV 81.0%) that correctly classified 85.1% of the study population.
Based on the results, the researchers propose to retest with GST all childhood onset-GHD patients with organic GHD (congenital anomalies, brain tumors, irradiation to the pituitary/hypothalamic region) with 0, 1, or 2 pituitary hormone defects with IGF-1≥ −2 SDS, and patients with idiopathic GHD with IGF-1 < 0 SDS.
Reference:
Fava, D., Guglielmi, D., Pepino, C., Angelelli, A., Casalini, E., Varotto, C., Panciroli, M., Tedesco, C., Camia, T., Naim, A., Allegri, A. E., Patti, G., Napoli, F., Gastaldi, R., Parodi, S., Salerno, M., Maghnie, M., & Di Iorgi, N. Accuracy of Glucagon Testing Across Transition in Young Adults With Childhood-Onset GH Deficiency. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae408
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.