Intermittent Fasting with Behavioral Support Outperforms Daily Calorie Cuts for Weight Loss, suggests study
A new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine suggests that intermittent fasting (IMF), specifically the 4:3 method, may be more effective than daily calorie restriction (DCR) over a 12-month period when paired with behavioral support.
This randomized clinical trial involved 165 adults aged 18 to 60 with a body mass index (BMI) between 27 and 46 kg/m². The participants were randomly assigned to one of two dietary strategies within a comprehensive behavioral weight loss program.
One group followed the 4:3 IMF regimen, eating normally four days per week and restricting energy intake by 80% on three nonconsecutive days. The other group adopted a traditional DCR approach, cutting daily caloric intake by 34%, designed to match the overall weekly calorie deficit of the IMF group. Both cohorts also received intensive group-based behavioral support and were advised to engage in 300 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity weekly.
After 12 months, the results found that the intermittent fasting group lost an average of 2.89 kilograms more than the daily calorie restriction group, a statistically significant difference (P = 0.040). The primary outcome measurement at 12 months highlighted that intermittent fasting, when backed by consistent behavioral support, led to greater sustained weight loss.
The analysis of this study was based on an intention-to-treat model, accounting for all randomized participants, even if they did not complete the study. Of the initial 165 participants (84 in the IMF group and 81 in the DCR group), 125 completed the yearlong trial. The average participant was 42 years old, predominantly female (73.9%), and had a mean BMI of 34.1 kg/m².
Although both groups benefited from the structured support system and physical activity recommendations, the findings highlight a modest but noteworthy edge for the intermittent fasting group. This research provides strong evidence that 4:3 IMF is not only feasible over a year but also slightly more effective than conventional calorie-cutting methods when behavioral guidance is included.
As intermittent fasting continues to gain popularity, this trial offers credible, science-backed support for its efficacy, especially for individuals seeking structured, sustainable weight loss strategies.
Source:
Catenacci, V. A., Ostendorf, D. M., Pan, Z., Kaizer, L. K., Creasy, S. A., Zaman, A., Caldwell, A. E., Dahle, J., Swanson, B., Breit, M. J., Bing, K., Wayland, L. T., Panter, S. L., Scorsone, J. J., Bessesen, D. H., MacLean, P., & Melanson, E. L. (2025). The effect of 4:3 intermittent fasting on weight loss at 12 months : A randomized clinical trial: A randomized clinical trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01631
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.