MD-DNB equivalence: Setback to DNB candidates as Supreme court dismisses petition
Advertisement
New Delhi: DNB candidates across the country have faced a major setback as the Supreme Court has dismissed the petition filed by Sankalp Association of DNB Doctors, Delhi that demanded equivalence of MD-DNB candidates for the purpose of teaching posts across medical colleges in the country.
Medical Dialogues team had earlier reported DNB candidates had faced a major disadvantage after the MCI notification of June 5, 2017 whereby the Medical Council amended Minimum Qualifications for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998. The amended rules implied that a DNB degree holder from a non-MCI recognized institute shall require 3 years of junior residency and 2 years of Senior residency, to be eligible for a teaching post of assistant professor, implying a clear 5 years of additional service if they dream to have a career in Medical Academia.
Objections were raised to the high degree of discrimination, with DNB candidates under the aegis of Sankalp Association of DNB Doctors filing a writ petition with the Supreme court on the matter. However, as a setback, through a recent decision, the apex court has disposed off the petition stating
Medical Dialogues team had earlier reported DNB candidates had faced a major disadvantage after the MCI notification of June 5, 2017 whereby the Medical Council amended Minimum Qualifications for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998. The amended rules implied that a DNB degree holder from a non-MCI recognized institute shall require 3 years of junior residency and 2 years of Senior residency, to be eligible for a teaching post of assistant professor, implying a clear 5 years of additional service if they dream to have a career in Medical Academia.
Objections were raised to the high degree of discrimination, with DNB candidates under the aegis of Sankalp Association of DNB Doctors filing a writ petition with the Supreme court on the matter. However, as a setback, through a recent decision, the apex court has disposed off the petition stating
We find no ground to entertain this petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.