Iptacopan monotherapy significantly boosts Hb levels in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Phase III Study

Written By :  Dr.Niharika Harsha B
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-01-03 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-01-03 14:30 GMT
Advertisement

The phase III APPLY-PNH Study found that Iptacopan monotherapy achieved significant clinically relevant improvement in hemoglobin levels with Hb levels ≥12 g/dL. This resulted in most patients' transfusion independence and clinically meaningful development in patient-reported fatigue. This increase in Hb levels occurred due to the resolution of extravascular hemolysis and the maintenance of intravascular hemolysis control. The trial results were presented at the 64th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition in New Orleans, Louisiana. 

The standard of care (SoC) for treating patients with hemolytic paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), is intravenous (IV) anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies (eculizumab [ECU]/ravulizumab [RAV]). However, clinically significant residual anemia was observed in up to 60% of SoC patients secondary to C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis results. In two Phase II trials, Iptacopan, a first-in-class oral selective complement factor B inhibitor has demonstrated promising safety and efficacy in anti-C5-treated and -naive PNH patients. Hence, Regis Latour and his team conducted a phase III trial and reported the primary efficacy and safety data from the 24-week randomized treatment period of the pivotal, multicenter, APPLY-PNH trial. 

Adult PNH patients with mean hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL on stable SoC therapy (ECU/RAV) for ≥6 months were randomized 8:5 to receive iptacopan monotherapy 200 mg twice daily or to continue their SoC regimen for 24 weeks. Randomization was stratified by prior SoC therapy and red blood cell transfusions (RBCTs) in the preceding 6 months.

The primary endpoint:

  1. The proportion of patients with a Hb increase o ≥2 g/dL from baseline. 
  2. The proportion of patients with Hb of ≥12 g/dL, each in the absence of RBCTs. 

Secondary endpoints: 

  1. Transfusion avoidance,
  2. Changes in Hb level from baseline,
  3. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue (FACIT-F) score,
  4. Absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level,
  5. Rates of clinical breakthrough hemolysis (BTH) and
  6. Major adverse vascular events (MAVEs), and safety.

A prespecified testing procedure adjusted for multiplicity; 2-sided P values are reported for significant endpoints only.

Findings of the trial: 

  • Of 97 patients, 62 and 35 were randomized to iptacopan and SoC, respectively.
  • Baseline disease characteristics were balanced between arms.
  • The mean age was 51 years and 69.1% of patients were female.
  • RBCTs were received by 57.7% of patients in the 6 months before randomization; 64.9% and 35.1% had received prior ECU and RAV, respectively, for a mean duration of 4 years.
  • Both primary endpoints were achieved with iptacopan monotherapy, showing superiority vs. SoC (both P<0.0001).

Primary

Endpoint

Iptacopan arm

SoC arm

Proportion of patients with ≥2 g/dL increase in Hb level from baseline without RBCTs

51/60 

0/35 

Proportion of patients with ≥12 g/dL increase in Hb level without RBCTs

42/60

0/35

  • Iptacopan monotherapy also showed superiority in transfusion avoidance, changes from baseline in Hb level, FACIT-F scores and ARC, and rate of clinical BTH (Table). 

Secondary

Endpoint

Iptacopan arm

SoC arm

Adjusted mean Hb change from baseline (95% CI)

+3.59 (3.32, 3.86) g/dL

−0.04 (−0.42, 0.35) g/dL

mean Hb levels (standard deviation) at 24 weeks irrespective of RBCTs

12.6 (1.4) g/dL

9.2 (1.4) g/dL

RBCT free

60/62

14/35

MAVE

1

  • No deaths or serious encapsulated bacterial infections were reported.
  • One iptacopan-treated patient had a MAVE which is a transient ischemic attack, and it was considered unrelated to iptacopan hence iptacopan treatment was continued.
  • Headache (iptacopan: 16.1% vs. SoC: 2.9%) and diarrhea (14.5% vs. 5.7%) were more commonly reported with iptacopan, whereas infections/infestations (38.7% vs. 48.6%) and BTH events (3.2% vs. 17.1%) were more commonly reported with SoC.
  • Serious adverse events like hemolysis were reported by two SoC-treated patients when compared with no iptacopan-treated patients.
  • But discontinuation of either iptacopan or SoC because of adverse events has not occurred. 

Thus, for PNH patients who inadequately respond to IV anti-C5 SoC therapy, iptacopan monotherapy may become a practice-changing, oral, outpatient treatment, and also a safer and potentially preferred treatment option for patients with hemolytic PNH.  

Further reading:  Oral Monotherapy with Iptacopan, a Proximal Complement Inhibitor of Factor B, Has Superior Efficacy to Intravenous Terminal Complement Inhibition with Standard of Care Eculizumab or Ravulizumab and Favorable Safety in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria and Residual Anemia: Results from the Randomized, Active-Comparator-Controlled, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III APPLY-PNH Study. LBA2, Presented at 64th Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 13, 2022. 


Tags:    
Article Source : 64th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News