Kerala HC to decide on NMC Restrictions on capping Attempts of MBBS prof exams

Published On 2022-09-03 11:03 GMT   |   Update On 2022-09-03 11:03 GMT
Advertisement

Ernakulam: The Kerala High Court has agreed listening to a plea challenging the National Medical Commission (NMC) rules restricting the number of attempts to clear the first Professional University MBBS Examination to four. 

Filed by a group of MBBS students belonging to various colleges under the Kerala University of Health Sciences (KUHS), the plea questions the amendment to the Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 introduced by NMC on 04.11.2019.

Advertisement

While the amendment makes it mandatory for the students to clear the examination within four attempts, the petitioners referred to the previous guidelines issued by the erstwhile Medical Council of India (MCI), now NMC. MCI rules demanded that the entire MBBS course gets completed within 10 years.

Allowing the plea, the HC bench comprising of Justice Devan Ramachandran has directed the authorities not to take any coercive action against the concerned students as long as the matter being considered by the court.

Noting that the matter was important and deserved to be admitted, the bench listed the matter on October 6, 2022 and observed, "I have heard Sri. M.R. Abhilash, learned Counsel for the petitioners and I am of the view that this writ petition deserves to be admitted. It is so ordered."

Further the bench noted, "...until whith time, status quo as regards the petitioners shall be maintained and no coercive action initiated against them without obtaining orders from this Court."

Also Read: KGMU to expel 37 students unable to clear MBBS for 20 years after one last chance

The plea has been filed through Advocates M.R. Abhilash, Sreepriya A., and Vishal Ajayan V. and in the plea, the petitioners have argued that after clearing the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) during the academic year 2019-2020, they had secured admission to the various colleges under the KUHS. Accordingly, their classes commenced on 8th August, 2019 onwards. 

As per the latest media report by Live Law, after the lockdown started because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the students continued attending their classes via virtual mode. However, the petitioners submitted that they faced several problems in that period as some of they were from places like Wayanad with network connectivity problems. Some of the students faced physical and mental health issues as well. Besides, the students were under immense stress because of the vast MBBS syllabus. On top of everything, online classes were also disrupted on frequent basis.

Meanwhile, KUHS announced conducting 1st year university examination for the 2019-2020 academic year students. The guidelines required that the candidates needed to obtain a minimum 50% marks separately for University theory examination in each subject. Besides, in order to be eligible for appearing at the final University test, it was necessary for the students to make sure that they do not score less than 40% in theory and practical separately assigned for internal assessment in a particular subject. As per the rules, those students, who pass the examination in three subjects during the first annual year are eligible for getting promoted to the second year.

Consequently, the Anatomy/ Physiology & Biochemistry exams had been conducted on March 15, 2021 and after the completion of the same, the students got the permission for joining the second year class for a period of four months. When the results were published on July 19, 2021, it was revealed that the petitioner students could not secure the minimum marks of 50% as required by the University. In fact, most of the students had failed in their subjects by 3 to 4 marks.

Following this, KUHS conducted the SAY examinations on August 16, 2021 for the students who could not clear three subjects in 1st annual year exams. However, the petitioners claimed that they were not given adequate time for revising the failed subjects and as a result they failed again. Consequently, they also failed in the supplementary examinations conducted afterwards.

Thereafter, issuing a notification on July 22, 2022, KUHS stated that the amended Regulations would be applicable for the students who were enrolled for the MBBS courses during the academic year 2019-2020.

As a result, the aggrieved students approached the High Court bench seeking relief. They contended that any amendments issued after repealing the MCI Act would be unconstitutional. It was further argued by them that since they had got enrolled to the MBBS course before the amendment, it would not be applicable to them.

Further, blaming the University, the students in their plea submitted that KUHS could have showed some leniency by allowing 5 grace marks in individual papers instead of adding the same to the total marks. This way, the petitioners could have cleared the exam.

Therefore, in their plea before the HC, the petitioners prayed for their right of attempting the forthcoming examination conducted by KUHS and requested the bench to issue further directions for allowing them to appear in the same. Besides, they also prayed before the court for declaring this new amendment as unconstitutional and violative of Article and set it aside.

To view the court order, click on the link below.

https://medicaldialogues.in/pdf_upload/kerala-hc-nmc-amendment-184944.pdf

Also Read: NMC Fee Order for 50 percent Private Medical College Seats not Applicable in Kerala: High Court

Tags:    
Article Source : with inputs from Live Law

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News