NEET PG 2025 transparency row: Supreme Court hearing listed for September 12

Published On 2025-09-10 12:30 GMT   |   Update On 2025-09-10 12:30 GMT
Advertisement

New Delhi: The Supreme Court is likely to hear the pleas demanding transparency in the National Eligibility-Entrance Test Postgraduate (NEET-PG) examination on Friday, i.e., 12.09.2025.

One of the pleas has been filed by doctors challenging the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) notification regarding the new disclosure mechanism of answer keys. The plea earlier filed by the United Doctors Front (UDF) had challenged the NBE's decision to hold the NEET PG 2025 examination in two shifts and the normalisation formula adopted by NBE.

Advertisement

Sharing the update regarding the case hearing, the advocate in the first case, Advocate Satyam Singh Rajpoot, shared on X, "NEET PG 2025 Transparency Matter Challenging NBEMS notification over exam transparency Case filed by Doctors & @UDF_BHARAT @drlakshyamittal listed on 12th September,2025. All the cases related to NEET PG will be heard together."

Medical Dialogues had earlier reported that a group of NEET-PG 2025 aspirants filed a plea before the Supreme Court challenging the "corrective notice" issued by the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) on August 21.

Also Read: 'Is it because you got less marks?' Supreme Court asks petitioners in NEET PG Transparency case

The plea claimed that the new disclosure mechanism of answer keys, as announced by NBEMS, is "opaque, unintelligible and incapable of meaningful verification."

In the notice dated 21.08.2025, NBEMS mentioned that the sequence of questions asked within a section of the Question paper of NEET-PG 2025 is shuffled for different candidates, and the order of four options for a question are also shuffled for different candidates. Therefore, NBE had decided that the questions, correct answer key and responses marked shall be displayed as per the sequence in Master set of Question Paper used for NEET-PG 2025.

When the matter came up for hearing before the top court bench comprising the Chief Justice and Justice K. Vinod Chandran on September 1, 2025, the bench noted that the plea involved the interpretation of the order passed by the Apex Court on 29.04.2025. Accordingly, the bench directed to place the matter before the bench presided over by Justice J.B.Pardiwala.

In the order dated 29.04.2025, the Apex Court bench comprising Justice J.B.Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan had issued 10-point directives to reform the National Eligibility-Entrance Test Postgraduate (NEET-PG) exam and the bench had also directed the National Board of Examinations (NBE) to publish the raw scores, answer keys, and normalisation formula for the NEET PG exam.


During the last hearing of the case, the Supreme Court bench had questioned the intent of the petitioners and adjourned the matter to the next week for further hearing.

The Supreme Court bench had asked the petitioners, "Why do you think there is no transparency? Is it because you got less marks?"

"Whenever the court tries to ensure a smooth process, people take undue advantage of it. Just take a chance, let’s go to the Supreme Court, invoke Article 32, ask for numbers, answer keys… Whatever you have performed…" the top court bench had further added.

Meanwhile, the plea by UDF was filed earlier this year and it had challenged the NBE's decision of NEET PG 2025 examination in two shifts and the normalisation formula adopted by NBE. Previously, the Supreme Court had directed NBE to hold the NEET PG 2025 exam in a single shift and it had earlier clarified that the issue related to the second relief claim would be considered after the conclusion of the examinations.

Also Read: NEET PG 2025: Two Shifts Will Lead to arbitrariness, Arrange Single-shift exam- SC tells NBE

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News