Solicitor General Tushar Mehta brought the development to the notice of Justices M M Sundresh and Satish Chandra Sharma.
Mehta said the complaints against Ramdev appeared to have been "sponsored" by some interested groups.
According to the PTI report, senior advocate Siddharth Dave, representing Ramdev, said in line with the previous directions, Chhattisgarh filed its response, but Bihar was yet to do it.
Also Read:Kerala Court issues bailable warrant against Baba Ramdev, MD Balakrishna in misleading ads case
The bench then adjourned the matter for December.
Previously, the complainants were asked to be impleaded as parties in his plea seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings.
The Patna and Raipur chapters of the Indian Medical Association (IMA) lodged complaints in 2021 alleging Ramdev's remarks were likely to cause prejudice to Covid control mechanism and may dissuade people from availing proper treatment.
Ramdev impleaded the Centre, Bihar, Chhattisgarh and IMA as parties.
Dave earlier said his client made a statement in 2021 that he does not believe in allopathic medicines, to which some doctors took offence and lodged multiple cases against him.
As an interim relief, Ramdev sought a stay on the investigation on the criminal complaints.
The IMA lodged complaints in Bihar and Chhattisgarh over Ramdev's remarks against the use of allopathic medicines during the pandemic.
The yoga guru was booked under various provisions of the IPC and the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
Ramdev, whose statements stirred a nationwide debate on Allopathy versus Ayurveda, had, however, withdrawn them after receiving a letter from then Union Health Minister Harsh Vardhan, who called his remarks "inappropriate", reports PTI.
The Delhi Medical Association (DMA), meanwhile, sought permission to become a party to the case, alleging that Ramdev insulted Allopathy and "instigated" people to disregard vaccines and treatment protocols.
The DMA, having 15,000 doctors as members, claimed Ramdev's Patanjali earned over Rs 1,000 crore by selling "Coronil" kits which were not approved by the competent authority.
Also Read:Delhi HC orders Baba Ramdev to remove Coronil COVID-19 Cure Claims within 3 Days
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.