- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Compared to basal infusion, Automated Mandatory Bolus May Improve Epidural Analgesia during Labor And Childbirth
Epidural analgesia is commonly used to provide pain relief during labour and childbirth. It involves the administration of local anaesthetics into the epidural space, resulting in a sensory blockade of the abdomen, pelvis, and perineum. To enhance analgesia, epidural opioids are often co-administered. Different methods of delivering epidural medications, such as basal infusion (BI) or automated mandatory bolus (AMB), have been employed, with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) allowing patients to self-administer additional boluses of medication.
Determining the optimal technique for delivering epidural medications, which offers effective pain relief while minimising adverse effects, has been a subject of interest. However, previous reviews have not provided clear evidence regarding the superiority of one method over the other. Additionally, factors such as the initiation of epidural analgesia (e.g., combined spinal-epidural) and the types and doses of medications used have not been adequately considered.
The review article was published in Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews by Hon Sen Tan which included a total of 18 studies involving 4,590 women. Out of these, 13 studies focused on healthy nulliparous women, while five studies included both nulliparous and multiparous women. All participants had term pregnancies, and women with preterm or complicated pregnancies were excluded from the studies.The techniques used to initiate epidural analgesia varied among the studies.
Seven studies utilized combined spinal epidural, 10 used epidural, and one used dural puncture epidural (DPE). There was also variation in the types of analgesics used. Ropivacaine with fentanyl was employed in eight studies, ropivacaine with sufentanil in three studies, levobupivacaine with sufentanil in two studies, levobupivacaine with fentanyl in one study, and bupivacaine with fentanyl in four studies.
● The results of the review indicated that automated mandatory bolus (AMB) was associated with a lower incidence of breakthrough pain compared to basal infusion (BI). The risk ratio (RR) for breakthrough pain was 0.71 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.55 to 0.91.
● AMB was also linked to a reduction in the hourly consumption of local anaesthetics (LA) in bupivacaine equivalents, with a mean difference (MD) of -0.84 mg/h and a 95% CI of -1.29 to -0.38.
● The incidence of caesarean delivery and instrumental delivery did not show significant differences between AMB and BI. The RR for caesarean delivery was 0.85 with a 95% CI of 0.69 to 1.06, while the RR for instrumental delivery was 0.85 with a 95% CI of 0.71 to 1.01.
● There was no significant difference in the duration of labour analgesia, with an MD of -8.81 minutes and a 95% CI of -19.38 to 1.77.Regarding maternal satisfaction and Apgar scores, the data were not pooled due to differences in measurement methods and timing.
● The results reported narratively suggested that AMB may be associated with increased maternal satisfaction, as eight studies reported increased satisfaction and six reported no difference.
● All studies showed no difference in Apgar scores.Subgroup analyses did not reveal significant differences, except for the comparison of epidural alone versus combined spinal-epidural (CSE) techniques, which found significant differences in LA consumption between AMB and BI.
The authors concluded that AMB offers advantages over BI in terms of reducing breakthrough pain and lowering local anaesthetic consumption. It may also improve maternal satisfaction. However, further large-scale studies are needed to assess the impact of AMB on the incidence of caesarean and instrumental deliveries. Overall, these findings contribute valuable insights into optimizing epidural analgesia for labour and childbirth, aiming to enhance the birthing experience for women while ensuring effective pain relief and minimizing adverse effects.
Reference:
Tan, H. S., Zeng, Y., Qi, Y., Sultana, R., Tan, C. W., Sia, A. T., Sng, B. L., & Siddiqui, F. J. (2023). Automated mandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD011344. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011344.pub3
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751