- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Transfusion not superior to no transfusion at an Hbg of 7.0 g/dL in critically ill patients: Study
Evaluation of transfusion targets other than a haemoglobin threshold of 7.0 G/dl may be warranted, according to a recent study published in the Annals of the American Thoracic Society.
In critically ill patients, a haemoglobin transfusion threshold of <7.0 G/dl compared to <10.0 G/dl improves organ dysfunction. However, it is unclear if transfusion at a haemoglobin of <7.0 g/dL is superior to no transfusion.
A group of researchers conducted a study to compare levels of organ dysfunction between transfusion and no transfusion at a haemoglobin threshold of <7.0 G/dl among critically ill patients using quasi-experimental regression discontinuity methods.
Researchers performed regression discontinuity analysis using haemoglobin measurements from patients admitted to ICUs in three cohorts (MIMIC-IV, eICU, and Premier Inc.), estimating the change in organ dysfunction (modified sequential organ failure assessment score) in the 24–72-hour window following each haemoglobin measurement.
They compared haemoglobin levels just above and below 7.0 g/dL using a 'fuzzy' discontinuity approach, based on the concept that measurement noise pseudorandomizes similar haemoglobin levels on either side of the transfusion threshold. Results: A total of 11,181, 13,664, and 167,142 patients were included in the MIMIC-IV, eICU, and Premier cohorts, respectively. Patient characteristics below the threshold did not differ from those above the threshold, except that crossing below the threshold resulted in a >20% absolute increase in transfusion rates in all three cohorts. Transfusion was associated with increases in hemoglobin level in the subsequent 24-72 hours (MIMIC-IV 2.4 [95% CI 1.1, 3.6] g/dL; eICU 0.7 [95% CI 0.3, 1.2] g/dL; Premier 1.9 [95% CI 1.5, 2.2] g/dL), but not with improvement in organ dysfunction (MIMIC-IV 4.6 [95% CI -1.2, 10] points; eICU 4.4 [95% CI 0.9, 7.8] points; Premier 1.1 [95% CI -0.2, 2.3] points), compared to no transfusion.
Thus, the researchers concluded that transfusion was not associated with improved organ dysfunction compared to no transfusion at a haemoglobin threshold of 7.0 g/dL, suggesting that evaluation of transfusion targets other than a haemoglobin threshold of 7.0 G/dl may be warranted.
Reference:
Red Blood Cell Transfusion at a Hemoglobin Threshold of Seven g/dL in Critically Ill Patients: A Regression Discontinuity Study by Nicholas A Bosch, et al. published in the Annals of the American Thoracic Society.
https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202109-1078OC
Dr. Shravani Dali has completed her BDS from Pravara institute of medical sciences, loni. Following which she extensively worked in the healthcare sector for 2+ years. She has been actively involved in writing blogs in field of health and wellness. Currently she is pursuing her Masters of public health-health administration from Tata institute of social sciences. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751