- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Delhi High Court admits PIL on smoking ban in the court
Delhi High Court is reported to have admitted a PIL indicating a ban on cigarette smoking at the premise of the court. The PIL once again draws attention to the fact of people being subjected to passive smoking as a result of such actions.
Also read: From 2016, 85 percent Anti Tobacco pictorial warnings on tobacco packaging
The PIL filed clearly sought a ban on smoking in court complex and removal of all shops selling tobacco and cigarette there citing ill-effects on health and contending that people cannot be "subjected to become passive smokers".
Also read: Assam to have more stringent Anti-smoking norms
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath asked the high court's registry to apprise it of the laws in this regard. "Apprise us with the rules and also the area where these shops are situated," the court said hearing the petition, adding "take instruction from the authority concerned before November 23".
The high court posed the query after advocate Vijay Chandra Jha, in his public interest litigation (PIL), stated that "people could not be subjected to becoming passive smokers".
Also read- Passive Smoking in Childhood Linked to Increased Risk of COPD
Also read: From 2016, 85 percent Anti Tobacco pictorial warnings on tobacco packaging
The PIL filed clearly sought a ban on smoking in court complex and removal of all shops selling tobacco and cigarette there citing ill-effects on health and contending that people cannot be "subjected to become passive smokers".
Also read: Assam to have more stringent Anti-smoking norms
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath asked the high court's registry to apprise it of the laws in this regard. "Apprise us with the rules and also the area where these shops are situated," the court said hearing the petition, adding "take instruction from the authority concerned before November 23".
The high court posed the query after advocate Vijay Chandra Jha, in his public interest litigation (PIL), stated that "people could not be subjected to becoming passive smokers".
Also read- Passive Smoking in Childhood Linked to Increased Risk of COPD
Next Story