- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Faculty Rules: Doctors Challenge MCI TEQ Regulations in Court
The petitioners said there was no age limit prescribed when they joined the PG medical courses.
Chennai: Various doctors have filed a petition in the Madras High Court against a clause of the Medical Council of India which prescribes 40 as the maximum age limit for appointment to the post of senior resident or assistant professor in medical colleges. Doctors in their petition have asked the court to declare the MCI legislation "unconstitutional, ultra vires, discriminatory and illegal"
The public interest litigation (PIL) petition came up recently before a bench, comprising Justices S Manikumar and Subramanioum Prasad.The bench posted the matter for further hearing on September 19 after Assistant Solicitor General Karthikeyan, appearing on behalf of the MCI, sought time to file a counter.
Medical Dialogues had earlier reported that last year the Medical Council of India had amended the Teachers eligibility Qualifications Rules (TEQ) bringing many changes in the rules for doctors to enter medical academia
Among other regulations, the council had brought an amendment vide Clause 6 of Schedule I of the Minimum Qualification for Teachers Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998, with effect from June 8, 2017, prescribing the age limit as 40 for posting as senior resident.
Read more at Medical Dialogues: MCI Clarification on Teachers Eligibility Rules; Check out the detailsÂ
They said the special rules of the Tamil Nadu Medical Services mandate that the post of the senior resident and the assistant professor must be held by a MBBS degree-holder who must have done PG work in a teaching institution for a period of not less than two years or he must possess a super speciality degree.
Further, the petitioners said there was no age limit prescribed when they joined the PG medical courses.
The government had forwarded a proposal to the Centre on November 27, 2017, to drop the criteria of age limit, making it clear it would affect the entire medical administration and further affect the career of the doctors who are encouraged to serve in rural/hilly/remote areas by awarding incentive marks.
Besides, the government had mentioned that the cap on age limit would be counterproductive to its policy decision, especially when seen against the MCI relaxing retirement age for faculty in medical colleges to 70 years.
The petitioners sought an interim injunction, besides declaring the clause as "unconstitutional, ultra vires, discriminatory and illegal.
Read aLso:Â The real reason why doctors cannot join Senior Resident after 40 years
Chennai: Various doctors have filed a petition in the Madras High Court against a clause of the Medical Council of India which prescribes 40 as the maximum age limit for appointment to the post of senior resident or assistant professor in medical colleges. Doctors in their petition have asked the court to declare the MCI legislation "unconstitutional, ultra vires, discriminatory and illegal"
The public interest litigation (PIL) petition came up recently before a bench, comprising Justices S Manikumar and Subramanioum Prasad.The bench posted the matter for further hearing on September 19 after Assistant Solicitor General Karthikeyan, appearing on behalf of the MCI, sought time to file a counter.
Medical Dialogues had earlier reported that last year the Medical Council of India had amended the Teachers eligibility Qualifications Rules (TEQ) bringing many changes in the rules for doctors to enter medical academia
Among other regulations, the council had brought an amendment vide Clause 6 of Schedule I of the Minimum Qualification for Teachers Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998, with effect from June 8, 2017, prescribing the age limit as 40 for posting as senior resident.
Read more at Medical Dialogues: MCI Clarification on Teachers Eligibility Rules; Check out the detailsÂ
The petitioners, all government doctors, submitted that they got admission to PG degree courses before the amendment.
They said the special rules of the Tamil Nadu Medical Services mandate that the post of the senior resident and the assistant professor must be held by a MBBS degree-holder who must have done PG work in a teaching institution for a period of not less than two years or he must possess a super speciality degree.
Further, the petitioners said there was no age limit prescribed when they joined the PG medical courses.
The government had forwarded a proposal to the Centre on November 27, 2017, to drop the criteria of age limit, making it clear it would affect the entire medical administration and further affect the career of the doctors who are encouraged to serve in rural/hilly/remote areas by awarding incentive marks.
Besides, the government had mentioned that the cap on age limit would be counterproductive to its policy decision, especially when seen against the MCI relaxing retirement age for faculty in medical colleges to 70 years.
The petitioners sought an interim injunction, besides declaring the clause as "unconstitutional, ultra vires, discriminatory and illegal.
Read aLso:Â The real reason why doctors cannot join Senior Resident after 40 years
Meghna A Singhania is the founder and Editor-in-Chief at Medical Dialogues. An Economics graduate from Delhi University and a post graduate from London School of Economics and Political Science, her key research interest lies in health economics, and policy making in health and medical sector in the country. She is a member of the Association of Healthcare Journalists. She can be contacted at meghna@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751
Next Story