- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
NEET 2026: NTA warns against fake, AI generated OMR sheets, scorecards

New Delhi: The National Testing Agency (NTA) has issued a stern warning to the NEET UG 2026 candidates, their parents, coaching institutes, and consultants against the creation, submission or circulation of fabricated, digitally altered, or AI-generated OMR answer sheets, scorecards, or other examination documents.
The agency has cautioned that such acts constitute cognisable offences under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, besides attracting penal provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, and the Information Technology Act, 2000.
The National Testing Agency conducted NEET (UG) 2026 on 21st June 2026, and has, in accordance with the prescribed transparency mechanism, uploaded on its website the provisional answer keys, the recorded responses and the scanned images of each candidate’s OMR answer sheet, and has also individually emailed to every registered candidate a scanned copy of his or her own OMR answer sheet at the e-mail address given at the time of registration.
With this, the candidates were also afforded a formal window to raise objections and to challenge answer keys and recorded responses. Following this, the result of NEET (UG) 2026 has been declared on 16th July 2026.
However, as per the public notice, it has come to the notice of the NTA, after the declaration of the result, a number of representations have been received from candidates or from persons purporting to act on their behalf, alleging that the OMR answer sheet uploaded against their Roll Number, or emailed to them, does not belong to them, or has been "interchanged", or shows a substantially lower number of answers than the candidate claims to have made.
In many such representations, the sender has enclosed an image of an OMR answer sheet, or of a score card, said to be the "correct" document, and has sought a re-evaluation of the result on the basis of that image.
The NTA has examined each such representation on the merits. In every case examined so far, the position on record is the same. The genuine OMR answer sheet of the candidate concerned, bearing the correct Roll Number, the correct Test Booklet Number, the correct Answer Sheet barcode, the correct Test Booklet Code, the candidate’s own name, parentage, signature and thumb impression, and the signatures of the invigilators, is held on record with NTA.
The score declared against that Roll Number is fully consistent with the official answer key and the calculation sheet. The image enclosed by, or on behalf of, the candidate with such a representation is, on forensic and record-based examination, not the OMR answer sheet issued by the Agency. It is a fabricated document.
Hence, the notice further states that the patterns of fabrication that have been observed include, but are not limited to, the following.
First, digital regeneration of the printed portion of the OMR sheet by AI-based image tools, which produces distinctive typographical distortions on parts of the sheet that were pre-printed by the Agency and cannot be altered by any candidate with a pen, such as the top-of-sheet instructions, the column headers over the response grid, the serially printed question numbers, the candidate declaration paragraph and the field labels.
Second, digital overwriting of the identity fields, that is, the candidate name, the parents’ names, the signature and the thumb impression, on an image of the candidate’s own genuine OMR sheet, while retaining the barcode, the booklet number and the shading on all 180 answer bubbles unchanged.
Third, digital alteration of the marks or the response counts shown on a downloaded score card or OMR image, while leaving in place the underlying QR code or barcode which continues to point to the genuine record on the Agency’s server.
Fourth, insertion into the fabricated image of a fictitious identity, that is, a candidate name and parentage that do not correspond to any candidate registered for NEET (UG) 2026.
Through the notice, NTA has advised the candidates and their guardians that the OMR answer sheet, the recorded responses, the score card and every other document generated in the course of NEET (UG) 2026 are public examination documents.
Every genuine document carries verifiable identifiers, including the barcode, the Test Booklet Number, the Answer Sheet number and, in the case of the score card, an embedded QR code.
Each such identifier resolves, on verification, to a single authoritative entry on the secure servers of the Agency and of the National Informatics Centre. A fabricated image may deceive the eye, but it does not, and cannot, alter the record on those servers.
In every proceeding in which such a fabricated image has so far been placed, whether before NTA itself or before any Court, the fabrication has been exposed on verification against the record, and the claim founded on it has failed.
Further, advised that the creation, possession, use, submission or circulation of a fabricated, digitally altered, AI-generated or otherwise forged OMR answer sheet, score card or any other public examination document, whether for the purpose of seeking a re-evaluation, or of securing an admission, or of amplifying an unfounded grievance in the public domain, constitutes a cognisable offence under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, and separately attracts liability under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the Information Technology Act, 2000.
The offences carry substantial terms of imprisonment and fines, and further carry the consequence of cancellation of candidature and debarment from future examinations conducted by the National Testing Agency, in accordance with the said Act.
The Agency may, in every case in which a fabricated document is found to have been submitted, place the finding on record by way of a written communication to the candidate and to the person, if different, who has submitted the document, initiate legal action against those creating these forged documents, including against any third party found to have prepared, supplied, brokered or amplified the fabricated document.
Meanwhile, the result declared on the basis of the genuine OMR answer sheet on record will, in every such case, stand as declared, and no re-evaluation, revision or reservation of seat will be undertaken on the basis of any fabricated image.
Nothing in this Notice affects the right of any candidate to raise a genuine grievance through the prescribed channel. Any candidate who is of the view that the OMR answer sheet held against his or her Roll Number contains a genuine error may submit a representation to the Agency at the helpdesk address published on the Agency’s website, quoting the Application Number, the Roll Number, the specific discrepancy alleged, and the basis of the allegation.
Candidates are advised, in their own interest, not to annex to any such representation any image or document that is not a copy of a document actually issued by the Agency or downloaded by the candidate from the Agency’s portal.
Any representation supported by a fabricated document will be dealt with, irrespective of whether the candidate claims to have been misled by a third party. In such cases, the candidate is expected to disclose the identity of the third party and to co-operate in the investigation.
Hence, all candidates, their parents and guardians, coaching institutes, consultants and any other person purporting to advise candidates in the matter of their NEET (UG) 2026 result, are advised accordingly. This Notice is issued in the public interest and without prejudice to any other action that the Agency or any other competent authority may take.
To view the public notice, click the link below
I am a student of Journalism and Mass Communication and also a passionate writer and explorer. With a keen interest in medicine, I have joined Medical Dialogues as a Content Writer. Within this role, I curate various healthcare-related news including the latest updates on health, hospitals, and regulatory updates from NMC/DCI. For any query or information, feel free to reach out to me at editorial@medicaldialogues.in

