- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Profiling the male germline genome to unravel its reproductive potential
The inability to reproduce is equally attributed to the male and female partners, with the remainder being due to a combined contribution. Screening of the woman includes an assessment of ovarian function, tubal patency, and uterine cavity. However, infertility investigation for the male partner is limited to a semen analysis. Although the semen analysis is useful in providing information on the presence, motility, and morphology of spermatozoa, it is unable to inform on the function or fertilizing capacity of the male gamete. This is especially important in cases with unexplained infertility, wherein couples with negative infertility workups and normal sperm parameters still experience reproductive failure due to poor or absent fertilization, poor embryo development, implantation failure, or worse, pregnancy loss
Over the years, genetic testing has become increasingly relevant in reproductive medicine. Genetic assessments in male infertility include testing for whole chromosomal structural aberrations, partial chromosomal defects, and monogenic diseases. These genetic tests are exclusively performed on peripheral blood samples, and although these tests are focused on identifying the etiology of compromised sperm production and preventing the transmission of inherited defects, they do not provide any information on gamete competence.
More intriguing is the identification of a subtle male factor or the detection of gamete function, particularly in individuals with normal semen parameters. There has recently been a renewed effort to identify superimposed occult factors that may impair a man’s reproductive potential and affect assisted reproductive technology (ART) related clinical outcomes.
Sperm chromatin fragmentation assays have become widely popular and can detect elevated sperm DNA fragmentation, which is correlated with poor embryo development, low implantation, and high miscarriage rates.
Regardless of the available ancillary assessments and genetic tests, the sperm-related reasons for poor ART outcome, occurring despite a normal semen analysis, remain largely unknown. Stephanie Cheung et al hypothesized that detectable genetic differences exist in spermatozoa obtained from men with unexplained infertility, and that these differences can be used to understand the specific aspects of their suboptimal ART outcomes. Therefore, in the study they investigated the relationship between the genetic profile of spermatozoa and the reasons for reproductive failure, after ICSI, in couples with negative infertility workups and normal sperm parameters.
In this retrospective study, couples were divided according to whether they had successful intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes (fertile) or not (infertile). Ancillary sperm function tests were performed on ejaculates, and whole exome sequencing was performed on spermatozoal DNA. Sperm aneuploidy and gene mutation profiles were compared between the 2 cohorts as well as according to the specific reasons for reproductive failure.
Thirty-one couples with negative infertility workups and normal semen parameters were included. Couples with mutations on fertilization- or embryo development-related genes were subsequently treated by assisted gamete treatment or microfluidics, respectively. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle outcomes including fertilization, clinical pregnancy, and delivery rates.
Sperm aneuploidy was lower in the fertile group (4.0% vs. 8.4%). Spermatozoa from both cohorts displayed mutations associated with sperm–egg fusion (ADAM3A) and acrosomal development (SPACA1), regardless of reproductive outcome.
The infertile cohort was then categorized according to the reasons for reproductive failure: absent fertilization, poor early embryo development, implantation failure, or pregnancy loss.
Spermatozoa from the fertilization failure subgroup (n = 4) had negligible PLCz presence (10%± 9%) and gene mutations (PLCZ1, PIWIL1, ADAM15) indicating a sperm-related oocyte-activating deficiency. These couples were successfully treated by assisted gamete treatment in their subsequent cycles.
Spermatozoa from the poor early embryo development subgroup (n = 5) had abnormal centrosomes (45.9%± 5%), and displayed mutations impacting centrosome integrity (HAUS1) and spindle/microtubular stabilization (KIF4A, XRN1).
Microfluidic sperm processing subsequently yielded a term pregnancy. Spermatozoa from the implantation failure subgroup (n = 7) also had abnormal centrosomes (53.1%± 13%) and carried mutations affecting embryonic implantation (IL9R) and microtubule and centrosomal integrity (MAP1S, SUPT5H, PLK4), whereas those from the pregnancy loss subgroup (n = 5) displayed mutations on genes involved in trophoblast development (NLRP7), cell cycle regulation (MARK4, TRIP13, DAB2IP, KIF1C), and recurrent miscarriage (TP53).
The lack of assessments on the male gamete is partially attributed to the fact that spermatogenesis is a complex process, controlled by well-coordinated transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulators. Nevertheless, the spermatozoon is not simply a carrier that delivers the male genome to the oocyte and should therefore not be overlooked. Although an array of ancillary tests can be used to evaluate spermatozoa, they can be tedious and inaccurate, and are each capable of assessing only a single facet of sperm reproductive potential.
By sequencing the sperm exome, authors identified candidate genes associated with the different causes of reproductive failure in couples with normal infertility workups and semen parameters. In addition, the novel variants identified in the study population may lay the foundation for future gene therapy research. Furthermore, these findings would allow for the design of a custom gene panel for targeted sperm DNA sequencing. This clinical panel, used prospectively at the time of semen analysis and before the start of the patients’ cycles, would encompass all of the altered genes identified in this study and could discern relevant genetic changes that can streamline male infertility clinical management. Most importantly, screening spermatozoa for these mutations would serve as a useful precision medicine tool to enhance the diagnosis, treatment, and prediction of clinical outcome for couples with unexplained infertility.
Source: Stephanie Cheung, Philip Xie, Zev Rosenwaks; Fertility and Sterility® Vol. 119, No. 2, February 2023 0015-0282 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.006
MBBS, MD Obstetrics and Gynecology
Dr Nirali Kapoor has completed her MBBS from GMC Jamnagar and MD Obstetrics and Gynecology from AIIMS Rishikesh. She underwent training in trauma/emergency medicine non academic residency in AIIMS Delhi for an year after her MBBS. Post her MD, she has joined in a Multispeciality hospital in Amritsar. She is actively involved in cases concerning fetal medicine, infertility and minimal invasive procedures as well as research activities involved around the fields of interest.
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751