- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Odisha: Court orders compensation to botched-up tubectomy patient
Odisha: Two decades after a botched-up tubectomy resulting in unwanted pregnancy, financial burden and mental agony, a Kendrapara court has directed the state government to pay the affected woman a compensation of Rupees one lakh.
Civil Judge (senior division), Kendrapara, Niranjan Panda yesterday directed Director, Family Welfare and Immunisation, Chief Medical Officer and the then medical officer of Rajkanika Community Health Centre (CHC) to pay Rs one lakh to Sebati Das, mother of two children and a resident of Ostia village who had undergone a sterilisation procedure at the government-run CHC on January 3, 1995.
Das received a rude jolt when she gave birth to her third child in 2000.
The court held that during the sterilisation procedure, the fallopian tubes were not plugged properly. The right tube was blocked while the left one was left open resulting in her unwanted pregnancy.
The court said it was negligence on part of the CHC officials which resulted in unwanted pregnancy, fiscal burden and mental agony of the couple.
The state health department is solely responsible for the failed sterilisation procedure and that is why it has to bear the cost of compensation to the aggrieved petitioner, the court ruled.
Though it was a case of belated justice, I am glad to hear that the court has taken considerate view of my prayer and has ruled in my favour. Judicial intervention of this nature is a warning to negligent doctors , the petitioner said.
Civil Judge (senior division), Kendrapara, Niranjan Panda yesterday directed Director, Family Welfare and Immunisation, Chief Medical Officer and the then medical officer of Rajkanika Community Health Centre (CHC) to pay Rs one lakh to Sebati Das, mother of two children and a resident of Ostia village who had undergone a sterilisation procedure at the government-run CHC on January 3, 1995.
Das received a rude jolt when she gave birth to her third child in 2000.
The court held that during the sterilisation procedure, the fallopian tubes were not plugged properly. The right tube was blocked while the left one was left open resulting in her unwanted pregnancy.
The court said it was negligence on part of the CHC officials which resulted in unwanted pregnancy, fiscal burden and mental agony of the couple.
The state health department is solely responsible for the failed sterilisation procedure and that is why it has to bear the cost of compensation to the aggrieved petitioner, the court ruled.
Though it was a case of belated justice, I am glad to hear that the court has taken considerate view of my prayer and has ruled in my favour. Judicial intervention of this nature is a warning to negligent doctors , the petitioner said.
Next Story