- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Bombay HC directs police not to compel gynaecologist for ID of minor seeking to terminate pregnancy
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has scheduled an urgent hearing for a petition filed by two gynaecologists challenging the actions of a police officer from a district near Mumbai in a minor's abortion case. The officer allegedly compelled one of the doctors to disclose the name and identity of a minor girl who sought an abortion in the clinic.
Under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the doctor was required to report the minor's pregnancy to the police, as the consent of a girl under 18 is considered immaterial. The petition argued that the Supreme Court has provided for the protection of a minor's identity in a case involving medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) and the rights of a minor.
The petition sought to underscore a critical issue that affects many cases involving the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) and minors. It emphasizes that for the limited purpose of providing MTP under the Act, the Supreme Court clarified that the registered medical practitioner—a gynaecologist authorized by law to perform MTP—must maintain the minor's privacy and need not disclose the minor's name and identity under the POCSO Act.
Sanchari Chattopadhyay has pursued her M.A in English and Culture Studies from the University of Burdwan, West Bengal. She likes observing cultural specificities and exploring new places.