Good cholesterol control improves cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes patients: JACC

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2020-11-07 06:10 GMT   |   Update On 2020-11-07 07:36 GMT
Advertisement

Canada: Lower LDL cholesterol in the first year after coronary revascularization in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes in the long run, according to a recent study in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) increases the risk of cardiovascular events, especially in population at high-risk such as patients with diabetes. The study by Michael E. Farkouh, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and colleagues aimed to determine the effect of LDL-C  on the incidence of cardiovascular events either following a coronary revascularization procedure (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) or optimal medical therapy alone in patients with T2D and coronary heart disease. 

Advertisement

For the purpose, the researchers undertook patient-level pooled analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials. T2D patients were categorized according to LDL-C levels at 1 year following randomization. A total of 4,050 patients were followed for a median of 3.9 years after the index 1-year assessment.

The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events ([MACCE] the composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke). 

Key findings of the study include:

  • Patients whose 1-year LDL-C remained ≥100 mg/dl experienced higher 4-year cumulative risk of MACCE (17.2% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.1% for LDL-C between 70 and <100 mg/dl and LDL-C <70 mg/dl, respectively).
  • When compared with optimal medical therapy alone, patients with PCI experienced a MACCE reduction only if 1-year LDL-C was <70 mg/dl (hazard ratio: 0.61), whereas CABG was associated with improved outcomes across all 1-year LDL-C strata.
  • In patients with 1-year LDL-C ≥70 mg/dl, patients undergoing CABG had significantly lower MACCE rates as compared with PCI.
  • Patients whose 1-year LDL-C remained ≥100 mg/dl experienced higher 4-year cumulative risk of MACCE (17.2% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.1% for LDL-C between 70 and <100 mg/dl and LDL-C <70 mg/dl, respectively).
  • When compared with optimal medical therapy alone, patients with PCI experienced a MACCE reduction only if 1-year LDL-C was <70 mg/dl (hazard ratio: 0.61), whereas CABG was associated with improved outcomes across all 1-year LDL-C strata.
  • In patients with 1-year LDL-C ≥70 mg/dl, patients undergoing CABG had significantly lower MACCE rates as compared with PCI.

"Lower LDL-C at 1 year in patients with coronary heart disease and T2D is associated with improved long-term MACCE outcome in those eligible for either PCI or CABG. When compared with optimal medical therapy alone, PCI was associated with MACCE reductions only in those who achieved an LDL-C <70 mg/dl. Thus, optimal LDL-C control may be pivotal to achieving optimal outcomes following PCI, which warrants further studies," concluded the authors. 

The study, "Influence of LDL-Cholesterol Lowering on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Coronary Revascularization," is published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

DOI: https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.536

Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News