UP MBBS Admissions: HC stays fresh counselling, directs SC student adjustment in vacant seats

Published On 2025-09-05 05:30 GMT   |   Update On 2025-09-05 05:30 GMT
Advertisement

Lucknow: The Allahabad High Court has recently directed the Uttar Pradesh government to adjust Scheduled Caste MBBS students, who were admitted under an excess 70 percent quota in four medical colleges, against vacant seats in other institutions.

The bench of Justices Rajan Roy and Manjive Shukla also stayed the single bench’s earlier order for fresh counselling and asked the state to file an affidavit within a week, undertaking to follow the statutory 21% SC quota from the next academic session.

The court noted that 82 SC seats were lying vacant in other colleges, where the affected students could be shifted to avoid disruption in admissions. Vacant seats in the four colleges-Ambedkar Nagar, Kannauj, Jalaun, and Saharanpur, will now be offered to OBC and unreserved candidates in the next counselling round. The matter will be heard again in October.

According to a recent PTI report, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court on Thursday directed the government to adjust Scheduled Caste (SC) MBBS students, who had been granted admission in four autonomous state medical colleges in an excess of 70 per cent quota against vacant seats elsewhere. The court also stayed the single bench's directive for fresh counselling and asked the state to submit an affidavit within a week confirming its undertaking to follow the statutory 21 per cent SC quota from the next academic session.

Advertisement

Also Read:HC quashes 79 percent reservation in UP govt medical colleges, orders strict 50 percent cap

It said the benefit of the interim order would cease if the affidavit were not filed.

Medical Dialogues had earlier reported that a bench of Justice Rajan Roy and Justice Manjive Shukla passed the order while hearing a special appeal by the state government against the August 28 single bench judgment that had quashed the 79 per cent quota granted to SC candidates for MBBS admission in Ambedkar Nagar, Kannauj, Jalaun, and Saharanpur medical colleges and ordered fresh counselling.

Senior advocate J N Mathur, appearing as special counsel for the state, submitted that the state had earlier defended the 70 per cent quota before the single bench but was now following a law that caps the SC quota at 21 per cent. The law cited was the Uttar Pradesh Admission to Educational Institutions, Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes Act, 2006.

Mathur argued that implementing fresh counselling as directed by the single bench would "throw the entire admission process haywire and create chaos." He said 82 SC category seats were vacant in other medical colleges where students admitted under the 70 per cent quota could be adjusted to "avoid imminent chaos and uncertainty."

The bench considered Mathur's arguments and noted that writ petitioner Sabra Ahmad, an OBC candidate, had already secured admission at Lakhimpur Kheri Medical College in the first round of counselling, and the state had offered her a seat at Ambedkar Nagar Medical College.

The bench said vacant seats in the four medical colleges would be offered to OBC and unreserved candidates in the second round of counselling. It stayed the single bench's order for fresh counselling and fixed the next hearing for the second week of October. The court also directed the state to file an affidavit on the next date detailing the steps taken to implement its interim directions, adds PTI

Also Read:NEET PwD Reservation must be based on Unique Disability ID card, Not Reassessment: Allahabad HC

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News