Why was emergency treatment not provided? Supreme court pulls up 3 Delhi Hospitals

Written By :  Adity Saha
Published On 2026-04-28 04:00 GMT   |   Update On 2026-04-28 04:00 GMT
Supreme Court of India
Advertisement

New Delhi: Taking suo motu cognisance of a case involving an alleged brutal attack on a patient by her husband, the Supreme Court of India on Monday ordered an investigation into allegations that three hospitals- Kailash Hospital, Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital and RK Hospital refused to provide her emergency treatment.

During the hearing, the Apex Court was informed that the woman was stabbed multiple times by her husband, causing serious injuries to vital parts of her body. She was in a critical condition when she was taken to nearby hospitals. However, three hospitals allegedly refused to admit her, reportedly citing the severity of her injuries. 

The patient was later admitted to All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in the early morning hours, where she received treatment. She was subsequently shifted to a private hospital, and her condition is now reported to be stable.

Also read- Supreme Court orders states to prepare 'realistic' action plan to implement ICU guidelines

Questioning why three hospitals refused emergency treatment to the woman who was allegedly brutally stabbed by her husband, the bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi directed the investigating officer to examine the circumstances and submit a detailed report, reports Live Law.

While hearing the case, the Bench asked: "Why was emergency treatment not provided?"

Appearing for the Delhi government, Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati informed the court that an FIR had been registered in the case and the accused husband was arrested on the night of April 25–26 and remanded to judicial custody.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court constituted an SIT to probe the rape and murder of a four-year-old minor girl. The court not only pulled up Ghaziabad police over allegations by the father of a biased probe but also sought an explanation from two private hospitals that denied treatment to the minor girl, who was reportedly brought alive to the private hospitals. The father of the girl child told the court that they had videos to show that the minor was alive when they reached the two hospitals. 

Also read- Supreme Court upholds April 26 Maharashtra Medical Council Polls

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News