NEET 2026 candidate moves Delhi HC alleging score changed thrice on NTA website in 24 hours
New Delhi: A NEET 2026 candidate has approached the Delhi High Court alleging discrepancies in the evaluation of his examination, claiming that the score displayed on the National Testing Agency (NTA) result portal changed three times within a span of less than 24 hours.
The petition seeks judicial intervention for verification of his original physical OMR answer sheet and preservation of all examination-related records.
The plea requested the Court to direct the NTA to produce and preserve the candidate's original OMR answer sheet along with associated electronic records, including server logs, scanning logs, audit trails and metadata, to facilitate an independent examination of the evaluation process. The matter is expected to come up for hearing before the Delhi High Court on Friday.
This year, nearly 20 lakh candidates appeared for the examination, which was conducted at 5,440 centres across 551 cities in India and 14 cities abroad. Out of them, 11.21 lakh candidates qualified for admission to MBBS, BDS, AYUSH and other allied undergraduate medical programmes.
A total of 138 candidates scored above 690 marks out of the maximum 720 marks. Of these, more than 93 per cent were appearing for NEET UG for the first time, and nearly 99 per cent belonged to the 17-19 age group.
The examination was conducted in 13 languages. Among the 138 candidates scoring 690 marks or above, 102 are male, and 36 are female. However, at the national level, women account for more than 58 per cent of the total 11.21 lakh candidates who qualified in NEET UG 2026.
According to ANI report, a NEET UG 2026 candidate has now approached the Delhi High Court alleging serious discrepancies in the evaluation process conducted by the National Testing Agency (NTA), claiming that his score displayed on the official result portal changed three times within less than 24 hours.
The petition, filed through Advocate Vineet Jindal, seeks directions for the production and preservation of the student's original physical OMR answer sheet and other examination-related records to enable independent verification of the evaluation process.
According to the petition, the student appeared in the NEET-UG 2026 examination held on June 21 and, after comparing his recorded responses with the provisional and final answer keys, estimated that he would score around 620 marks.
However, when the results were declared on July 16, the NTA portal allegedly first displayed 650 marks, then 500 marks after the portal logged him out and he logged in again, and finally 135 marks on the following day.
The petition claimed that no explanation has been provided by the authorities for these successive changes in the displayed score.
The plea stated that the student immediately sent multiple email representations to the NTA and also filed an application under the Right to Information Act seeking disclosure of records relating to his evaluation and original OMR sheet, adds ANI
Receiving no satisfactory response, he personally visited the NTA office in New Delhi on July 20. According to the petition, officials showed him an OMR sheet on a computer screen and claimed it to be his answer sheet, but he disputed its authenticity, maintaining that it was not the OMR sheet filled by him during the examination.
The petition further alleges that despite his objection, officials informed him that it was the only OMR sheet available in their records and that the same document would be produced even before the Court. The same OMR sheet was later emailed to him, which he continues to dispute.
The petition also highlights an alleged discrepancy in a calculation sheet supplied by the NTA, stating that it mentions the examination date as 21 July 2026 instead of 21 June 2026, the actual date on which NEET-UG 2026 was conducted.
According to the plea, this inconsistency raises doubts about the authenticity and reliability of the records maintained by the agency.
Clarifying that the student is not seeking re-evaluation of his answers, the petition says the grievance is limited to verification of the original physical OMR answer sheet and the connected electronic records.
It seeks directions to the NTA to produce the original OMR sheet before the Court, preserve all relevant digital records including server logs, scanning logs, audit trails and metadata, and permit the student to participate in the ongoing NEET-UG 2026 counselling process.
The petition further prays for appointment of an independent expert, forensic laboratory or Court Commissioner to examine the original OMR sheet and related electronic records and submit a report before the Court.
Also Read:NEET 2026: NTA warns against fake, AI generated OMR sheets, scorecards
Kajal Rajput joined Medical Dialogues as an Correspondent for the Latest Health News Section in 2019. She holds a Bachelor's degree in Arts from University of Delhi. She manly covers all the updates in health news, hospitals, doctors news, government policies and Health Ministry. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in Contact no. 011-43720751
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.