- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Delhi HC provides relief to medical establishments operating in residential areas
In a decision that will bring high relief to medical centers across the capital, the Delhi high Court has quashed the petition demanding the closure of all medical facilities, diagnostic centers, path labs, nursing homes and similar kind of other institutions in residential areas
In a PIL filed by PAARDARSHITA PUBLIC WELFARE
FOUNDATION (NGO) against COMMISSIONER SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS, the petitioner ( NGO ) had demanded writ of mandamus or directions to the respondents to immediately stop all kinds of hazardous activities in the residential areas of Delhi which are in the shape and style of illegal and unauthorized diagnostic centers, medical facilities, path labs, nursing homes and similar kind of other institutions in view of the recent judgment of the Hon”ble Supreme Court in the case of Anirudh Kumar vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors. Civil Appeal No.8284/2013 dated 20.03.2015.
However, the honorable court maintained the decision in the above mentioned case was pertaining only to the facts and parties mentioned in the said case and cannot be generalized as a principle to all medical establishments which may be in residential colonies.
This comes as a relief to many medical establishments including nursing homes and path labs working in residential areas.
You can read a copy of the judgment in the link below.
paardarshita public welfare foundation versus commisioner SDMC
Correction : in the earlier version, the Delhi High courts decision was wrongly referred to as Supreme Court's decision at medical dialogues news. Medical Dialogues sincerely apologises for the same.
In a PIL filed by PAARDARSHITA PUBLIC WELFARE
FOUNDATION (NGO) against COMMISSIONER SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS, the petitioner ( NGO ) had demanded writ of mandamus or directions to the respondents to immediately stop all kinds of hazardous activities in the residential areas of Delhi which are in the shape and style of illegal and unauthorized diagnostic centers, medical facilities, path labs, nursing homes and similar kind of other institutions in view of the recent judgment of the Hon”ble Supreme Court in the case of Anirudh Kumar vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors. Civil Appeal No.8284/2013 dated 20.03.2015.
However, the honorable court maintained the decision in the above mentioned case was pertaining only to the facts and parties mentioned in the said case and cannot be generalized as a principle to all medical establishments which may be in residential colonies.
This comes as a relief to many medical establishments including nursing homes and path labs working in residential areas.
You can read a copy of the judgment in the link below.
paardarshita public welfare foundation versus commisioner SDMC
Correction : in the earlier version, the Delhi High courts decision was wrongly referred to as Supreme Court's decision at medical dialogues news. Medical Dialogues sincerely apologises for the same.
Meghna A Singhania is the founder and Editor-in-Chief at Medical Dialogues. An Economics graduate from Delhi University and a post graduate from London School of Economics and Political Science, her key research interest lies in health economics, and policy making in health and medical sector in the country. She is a member of the Association of Healthcare Journalists. She can be contacted at meghna@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751
Next Story