Medical Dialogues
  • Dermatology
Login Register
This site is intended for healthcare professionals only
Login Register
  • MD Brand Connect
  • Vaccine Hub
  • MDTV
    • Breaking News
    • Medical News Today
    • Health News Today
    • Latest
    • Journal Club
    • Medico Legal Update
    • Latest Webinars
    • MD Shorts
    • Health Dialogues
  • Fact Check
  • Health Dialogues
Medical Dialogues
  • Medical News & Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cardiology and CTVS
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endocrinology
      • ENT
      • Gastroenterology
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurology
      • Obstretics-Gynaecology
      • Oncology
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Pediatrics-Neonatology
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
      • Laboratory Medicine
      • Diet
      • Nursing
      • Paramedical
      • Physiotherapy
  • Health news
      • Doctor News
      • Government Policies
      • Hospital & Diagnostics
      • International Health News
      • Medical Organization News
      • Medico Legal News
      • NBE News
      • NMC News
  • Fact Check
      • Bone Health Fact Check
      • Brain Health Fact Check
      • Cancer Related Fact Check
      • Child Care Fact Check
      • Dental and oral health fact check
      • Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
      • Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
      • Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
      • Fitness fact check
      • Gut health fact check
      • Heart health fact check
      • Kidney health fact check
      • Medical education fact check
      • Men's health fact check
      • Respiratory fact check
      • Skin and hair care fact check
      • Vaccine and Immunization fact check
      • Women's health fact check
  • AYUSH
    • Ayurveda
    • Homeopathy
    • Siddha
    • Unani
    • Yoga
  • State News
      • Andaman and Nicobar Islands
      • Andhra Pradesh
      • Arunachal Pradesh
      • Assam
      • Bihar
      • Chandigarh
      • Chattisgarh
      • Dadra and Nagar Haveli
      • Daman and Diu
      • Delhi
      • Goa
      • Gujarat
      • Haryana
      • Himachal Pradesh
      • Jammu & Kashmir
      • Jharkhand
      • Karnataka
      • Kerala
      • Ladakh
      • Lakshadweep
      • Madhya Pradesh
      • Maharashtra
      • Manipur
      • Meghalaya
      • Mizoram
      • Nagaland
      • Odisha
      • Puducherry
      • Punjab
      • Rajasthan
      • Sikkim
      • Tamil Nadu
      • Telangana
      • Tripura
      • Uttar Pradesh
      • Uttrakhand
      • West Bengal
  • Medical Education
      • Ayush Education News
      • Dentistry Education News
      • Medical Admission News
      • Medical Colleges News
      • Medical Courses News
      • Medical Universities News
      • Nursing education News
      • Paramedical Education News
      • Study Abroad
  • Industry
      • Health Investment News
      • Health Startup News
      • Medical Devices News
      • Pharma News
      • Pharmacy Education News
      • Industry Perspective
  • MDTV
      • Health Dialogues MDTV
      • Health News today MDTV
      • Latest Videos MDTV
      • Latest Webinars MDTV
      • MD shorts MDTV
      • Medical News Today MDTV
      • Medico Legal Update MDTV
      • Top Videos MDTV
      • Health Perspectives MDTV
      • Journal Club MDTV
      • Medical Dialogues Show
This site is intended for healthcare professionals only
LoginRegister
Medical Dialogues
LoginRegister
  • Home
  • Medical news & Guidelines
    • Anesthesiology
    • Cardiology and CTVS
    • Critical Care
    • Dentistry
    • Dermatology
    • Diabetes and Endocrinology
    • ENT
    • Gastroenterology
    • Medicine
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstretics-Gynaecology
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Orthopaedics
    • Pediatrics-Neonatology
    • Psychiatry
    • Pulmonology
    • Radiology
    • Surgery
    • Urology
    • Laboratory Medicine
    • Diet
    • Nursing
    • Paramedical
    • Physiotherapy
  • Health news
    • Doctor News
    • Government Policies
    • Hospital & Diagnostics
    • International Health News
    • Medical Organization News
    • Medico Legal News
    • NBE News
    • NMC News
  • Fact Check
    • Bone Health Fact Check
    • Brain Health Fact Check
    • Cancer Related Fact Check
    • Child Care Fact Check
    • Dental and oral health fact check
    • Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
    • Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
    • Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
    • Fitness fact check
    • Gut health fact check
    • Heart health fact check
    • Kidney health fact check
    • Medical education fact check
    • Men's health fact check
    • Respiratory fact check
    • Skin and hair care fact check
    • Vaccine and Immunization fact check
    • Women's health fact check
  • AYUSH
    • Ayurveda
      • Ayurveda Giuidelines
      • Ayurveda News
    • Homeopathy
      • Homeopathy Guidelines
      • Homeopathy News
    • Siddha
      • Siddha Guidelines
      • Siddha News
    • Unani
      • Unani Guidelines
      • Unani News
    • Yoga
      • Yoga Guidelines
      • Yoga News
  • State News
    • Andaman and Nicobar Islands
    • Andhra Pradesh
    • Arunachal Pradesh
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chandigarh
    • Chattisgarh
    • Dadra and Nagar Haveli
    • Daman and Diu
    • Delhi
    • Goa
    • Gujarat
    • Haryana
    • Himachal Pradesh
    • Jammu & Kashmir
    • Jharkhand
    • Karnataka
    • Kerala
    • Ladakh
    • Lakshadweep
    • Madhya Pradesh
    • Maharashtra
    • Manipur
    • Meghalaya
    • Mizoram
    • Nagaland
    • Odisha
    • Puducherry
    • Punjab
    • Rajasthan
    • Sikkim
    • Tamil Nadu
    • Telangana
    • Tripura
    • Uttar Pradesh
    • Uttrakhand
    • West Bengal
  • Medical Education
    • Ayush Education News
    • Dentistry Education News
    • Medical Admission News
    • Medical Colleges News
    • Medical Courses News
    • Medical Universities News
    • Nursing education News
    • Paramedical Education News
    • Study Abroad
  • Industry
    • Health Investment News
    • Health Startup News
    • Medical Devices News
    • Pharma News
      • CDSCO (Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation) News
    • Pharmacy Education News
    • Industry Perspective
  • Home
  • News
  • Health news
  • Medico Legal News
  • Homeopath Poses as...

Homeopath Poses as Gynaecologist, prescribes allopathic medicines: Consumer Court Slaps Rs 30 Lakh Compensation for medical negligence

Barsha MisraWritten by Barsha Misra Published On 2024-03-21T17:09:48+05:30  |  Updated On 21 March 2024 7:07 PM IST
Homeopath Poses as Gynaecologist, prescribes allopathic medicines: Consumer Court Slaps Rs 30 Lakh Compensation for medical negligence
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Email

Lucknow: Holding medical negligence, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC), Lucknow recently directed a city-based private nursing home and a homeopathy practitioner to pay Rs 30 lakh as compensation to a man whose pregnant wife died while giving birth to a child at the facility.

While considering the complaint by the man, the State consumer court noted that the concerned Homeopath had misrepresented herself claiming to be a Gynaecologist and prescribed allopathic medicine.

"Now it is clear that there is total lack of medical protocol in the treatment of the patient and the opposite party knowingly deputed herself as a gynaecologist and she advised allopathic medicines. If the complainant would have known that she is not registered Gynaecologist she would not have come to her nursing home for delivery. So it is a clear case of medical negligence and deficiency in service," the consumer court bench observed in its order.

"The opposite parties are directed jointly and severally to pay ₹ 25 lakhs to the complainant in relation to medical negligence and deficiency in service, with interest at a rate of 12% from16.01.2014 (the date of death of the patient) if paid within 30 days from the judgment of this complaint case otherwise the rate of interest shall be 15% from 16.01.2014 till the date of actual payment," ordered the Commission.

"The opposite parties are directed jointly and severally to pay ₹ 5 lakhs to the complainant with interest at a rate of 12% from16.01.2014 (the date of death of the patient) if paid within 30 days from the judgment of this complaint case otherwise the rate of interest shall be 15% from 16.01.2014 till the date of actual payment," it further mentioned in the order, granting an additional Rs 20,000 to the complainant as legal cost.

The matter goes back to 2014 when the complainant's wife was pregnant and got admitted to the treating facility Sri Mankameshwar Nursing Home and the treating practitioner at the facility allegedly told the complainant that she was a gynaecologist and specialist in gynaecology. The next day, the patient gave birth to a female child through normal delivery and the practitioner allegedly assured the complainant that both the patient and the child were fine.

However, later the patient's condition worsened and the complainant was asked to arrange blood. Soon afterwards, the complainant was informed that the patient had passed away.

It came as a shock to the complainant when he got to know that the treating practitioner had a degree in Homeopathic Medicine but she was prescribing allopathic medicines and treated the patient through allopathy.

The complainant alleged that the practitioner had no right to prescribe any allopathic medicines. Further claiming that his wife had died due to excess bleeding and the Homeopathic doctor could not take care of the patient properly, the complainant lodged an FIR at Hasanganj police station, Lucknow. The complainant also approached the Medical Council and filed a complaint. Following this, the Council constituted a Medical Board to investigate the matter.

After an inquiry, the Medical Board submitted its report in which it was stated that the practitioner had homeopathy degree but she was practising in allopathic medicine and this action on the part of the doctor was medical negligence.

Later, the complainant approached the Consumer Court and demanded Rs 45 lakh as compensation from the nursing home and the practitioner for causing mental agony and economic harassment to the complainant.

On the other hand, the practitioner and nursing home denied having claimed that she was a gynaecologist and specialist in gynaecology. It was submitted that the patient was not fit after the delivery and was bleeding and the same could be seen in the delivery note of the treatment chart. They claimed that the complainant was intimated about the condition of the patient i.e. postpartum haemorrhage and the emergency.

Although they did not deny that the treating doctor was a BHMS graduate, they vehemently opposed the claim that the practitioner prescribed any allopathic medicines to the patient. Further, they submitted that the patient was treated by the husband of the practitioner. He was a co-owner of the facility and has an MBBS and MD degree. Therefore, he was qualified and authorised to treat the patient by prescribing allopathic medicines.

They claimed that the patient expired due to excessive bleeding and the practitioner neither committed any medical negligence in the treatment nor showed any deficiency of service. Allegedly, the FIR was lodged after a month mentioning the wrong facts only to harass them and extort money.

While considering the matter, the consumer court referred to the legal precedents set by the Supreme Court and NCDRC and noted that there was a total lack of medical protocol in the treatment of the patient and the practitioner knowingly deputed herself as a gynaecologist and she advised allopathic medicines.

Further, the Commission referred to the Clinical Notes and noted, "Profuse bleeding was there and patient was in shock. It clearly means that the condition of the patient has become very critical and in spite of it she was not shifted to ICU."

Noting that the patient was declared dead only a few hours after informing the attendant to arrange blood, the Commission observed,

"It shows that there was total lack of post delivery treatment in which the opposite parties totally failed to discharge their duties. They were negligent in not providing the supportive medical care as per medical protocol to the patient. There is no ultrasound report on the record which can show the internal condition of the uterus and placenta."

Referring to the Medical Literature in respect of postpartum haemorrhage, the Commission further noted, "No investigation was done regarding this aspect. One can know this condition if there is heavy bleeding from the vagina that does not slow or stop, drop in blood pressure or signs of shock. Signs of low blood pressure and shock include blurry vision; having they said, clammy skin or really fast heartbeat; feeling confused, DC, sleepy or weak; or feeling like you are going to faint. Nausea, pale skin and swelling and pain around the vagina or perineum. The perineum is the area between the vagina and rectum. There are so many other conditions by which one can know about PPH. There is provision for testing of PPH and also for the treatment of PPH. In this case the opposite party did not bother to confirm the PPH at the very beginning because they did not take any sonography picture of the patient."

Therefore, the State Consumer Court opined that the treating practitioner misrepresented the patient by showing herself as a gynaecologist and failed to take proper medical care of the patient.

"They completely failed to provide medical facilities after the delivery. They failed to recognise PPH at the relevant time by which this incident happened. The blood should have been arranged in the very beginning and not at the 11th hour. It was duty of the opposite parties to inform the patient’s attendant in time about the need of any blood or any other medicines which may be necessary in the treatment of the patient but they have taken it very lightly. So there is medical negligence and the maxim res ipsa loquitur applies in this case," noted the Commission.

After going through the circumstances and inquiry report and the judgment of the Supreme Court and NCDRC, the consumer court bench granted the following reliefs:

"(i) The complainant is entitled to get ₹ 25 lakhs from the opposite parties with interest.

(ii) The complaint is entitled to get ₹ 5 lakhs for mental pain and agony.

(iii) The complainant is entitled to get ₹ 20,000 towards cost of the case."

To view the order, click on the link below:

https://medicaldialogues.in/pdf_upload/lucknow-scdrc-234660.pdf

Also Read: Delay in C-Section results in death of patient, newborn: Hospital, Doctors directed to pay Rs 43 lakh compensation

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissiongynaecologisthomeopathcompensationmedical negligenceAllopathymedicine
Barsha Misra
Barsha Misra

Barsha completed her Master's in English from the University of Burdwan, West Bengal in 2018. Having a knack for Journalism she joined Medical Dialogues back in 2020. She mainly covers news about medico legal cases, NMC/DCI updates, medical education issues including the latest updates about medical and dental colleges in India. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.

Show Full Article
Next Story

Editorial

Real-World Case study: Darbepoetin Alfa for Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Metastatic Breast Cancer - Dr Aditya Murali

Real-World Case study: Darbepoetin Alfa for Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Metastatic Breast Cancer...

Aspirin in Primary Prevention- When to Consider?

Aspirin in Primary Prevention- When to Consider?

Featured image representing medico legal

What's the Role of Expert Opinion in Medical Negligence?

7- Point Discharge Protocol for AECOPD: Time to Inculcate in Practice

7- Point Discharge Protocol for AECOPD: Time to Inculcate in Practice

Aspirin Use in Women Aged 40-50 with Diabetes and Hypertension: Identifying the Ideal Candidates

Aspirin Use in Women Aged 40-50 with Diabetes and Hypertension: Identifying the Ideal Candidates

View All

Journal Club Today

Real-World Case study: Darbepoetin Alfa for Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Metastatic Breast Cancer - Dr Aditya Murali

Real-World Case study: Darbepoetin Alfa for Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Metastatic Breast Cancer...

View All

Health News Today

Health Bulletin 09/ May/ 2025

Health Bulletin 09/ May/ 2025

View All
© 2022 All Rights Reserved.
Powered By: Hocalwire
X
We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok