- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Amniotomy followed by Foley catheter removal increased faster child birth
Amniotomy within one hour of Foley catheter removal resulted in a 2.3-fold quicker birth than expectant management, says an article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.
Although early amniotomy reduces the duration of spontaneous labor, there is no clear data on the best time to do amniotomy after cervical softening. There have been just a few high-quality studies on the use of early amniotomy intervention after labor induction. As a result, Helen B. Gomez Slagle and colleagues undertook this study to see if amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion shortens labor length in persons having combination misoprostol and Foley catheter labor induction at term.
From November 2020 to May 2021, a randomized clinical trial compared amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter ejection (early artificial rupture of membranes) versus expectant care. Parity was used to stratify the randomization. Participant labor management was standardized. Individuals who needed cervical ripening and were having induction at 37 weeks with a singleton pregnancy were suitable. The main outcome of this study was delivery time. Pearson chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Cox survival analyses were done with intent-to-treat principles, correcting for age, BMI, parity, method of delivery, Bishop score, and the interactions between randomization group and parity. To detect a 4-hour decrease in delivery time, a sample size of 160 was intended.
The key findings of this study were as follow:
1. A total of 160 individuals were randomized (79 for early artificial rupture of membranes and 81 for expectant management).
2. The median time to delivery was quicker with early artificial rupture of membranes than with expectant treatment.
3. A higher proportion of people in the early artificial rupture of the membrane group had birth within 24 hours.
4. The cesarean delivery rate did not differ between the two groups. Patients delivered 2.3 times quicker after early artificial membrane rupture.
5. There were no statistically significant differences in maternal and newborn outcomes.
In conclusion, in people having mechanical cervical ripening at term, early artificial membrane rupture should be explored.
Reference:
Gomez Slagle, H. B., Fonge, Y. N., Caplan, R., Pfeuti, C. K., Sciscione, A. C., & Hoffman, M. K. (2022). Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial. In American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1368
Medical Dialogues consists of a team of passionate medical/scientific writers, led by doctors and healthcare researchers. Our team efforts to bring you updated and timely news about the important happenings of the medical and healthcare sector. Our editorial team can be reached at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751